Jump to content

Poor Wireless Signal


The Little Guy

Recommended Posts

OK, Im trying to install the drivers, but i have no idea what I am doing.

 

I am getting this error:

 

ryan@ryan-laptop:~/Desktop/rtl8185_linux_26.1027.0823.2007$ sudo ./wlan0up

insmod: can't read 'ieee80211_crypt-rtl.ko': No such file or directory

insmod: can't read 'ieee80211_crypt_wep-rtl.ko': No such file or directory

insmod: can't read 'ieee80211_crypt_tkip-rtl.ko': No such file or directory

insmod: can't read 'ieee80211_crypt_ccmp-rtl.ko': No such file or directory

insmod: can't read 'ieee80211-rtl.ko': No such file or directory

insmod: can't read 'r8180.ko': No such file or directory

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is some driver information:

 

06:09.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL-8185 IEEE 802.11a/b/g Wireless LAN Controller (rev 20)

        Subsystem: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. Device 8225

        Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 64, IRQ 11

        I/O ports at 6000

        Memory at b3400000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable)

        Capabilities: <access denied>

        Kernel driver in use: rtl8180

        Kernel modules: rtl8180

 

The drivers are installed, but I don't think they are correct, or even up to date.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It doesn't make sense for the software to influence the connection strength of the hardware.

 

Something environmental has changed, or one of the two OSes is lying to you.

 

Using drivers not specifically designed for the hardware can result in poor performance.

 

Hrmmm, true.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You should probably go to their site and download the latest driver.

 

I did a search on, "Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL-8185 IEEE ubuntu", and found that a lot of other people are having similar/worse problems, as in they can't even get a connection.  The issue seems to lie either with Ubuntu, the driver being out of date, or just having the wrong driver.

 

Has this card worked properly on previous versions of Ubuntu?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The issue could actually be just the software your using to report your link quality with.

 

What does the following produce?

 

$ sudo iwconfig wlan0 | grep 'Link Quality'

 

Assuming wlan0 is your card.

 

The issue seems to lie either with Ubuntu, the driver being out of date, or just having the wrong driver.

 

Driver issues rarely have anything to do with the distribution, they are part of the kernel itself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I've noticed it too. I have XP and Ubuntu 8.10 on the same machine, different drives. I get much better reception in XP than Ubuntu. So it's not just you!

 

As for the weather, I've noticed also that cloudy days / rain do tend to decrease reception. I've noticed that with cell phones too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've noticed it too. I have XP and Ubuntu 8.10 on the same machine, different drives. I get much better reception in XP than Ubuntu. So it's not just you!

 

As for the weather, I've noticed also that cloudy days / rain do tend to decrease reception. I've noticed that with cell phones too.

 

I bet it is driver related then....

 

 

 

I really don't know why drivers would make a signal measure wrong though.  I guess the strength of the signal essentially comes down to how quickly data can pass through the computer though, so if the driver were slowing things down....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
I get much better reception in XP than Ubuntu. So it's not just you!

 

I get similar problems with my Ipod Touch and my Laptop running Vista. Could it be a router problem?

 

My bet is that *nix just has more accurate monitoring tools than windows.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is more than a year old. Please don't revive it unless you have something important to add.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.