Jump to content


Is it "wrong" to piggyback off someone's wireless network?


  • Please log in to reply
61 replies to this topic

Poll: Is it "wrong" to piggyback off someone's wireless network? (77 member(s) have cast votes)

Is it "wrong" to piggyback off someone's wireless network?

  1. Yes (always) (16 votes [20.51%])

    Percentage of vote: 20.51%

  2. No (never) (22 votes [28.21%])

    Percentage of vote: 28.21%

  3. Not when it's intentionally left open. (35 votes [44.87%])

    Percentage of vote: 44.87%

  4. Not when it's an emergency. (5 votes [6.41%])

    Percentage of vote: 6.41%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 Guest_kilbad_*

Guest_kilbad_*
  • Guests

Posted 25 August 2006 - 09:34 PM

Is it "wrong" to piggyback off someone's wireless network? If so, in what sense?

#2 wildteen88

wildteen88
  • Staff Alumni
  • Advanced Member
  • 10,482 posts
  • LocationUK, Bournemouth

Posted 25 August 2006 - 11:15 PM

I'd say yes as you could be using that persons network to do illegal things. You are also stealling that persons service and bandwidth.

#3 ober

ober
  • Staff Alumni
  • Advanced Member
  • 5,337 posts
  • LocationEast Coast, USA

Posted 26 August 2006 - 03:03 AM

If they're dumb enough to leave it wide open, and I need a connection, I will gladly use it.  I certainly wouldn't do anything illegal on it, however.

Info: PHP Manual


#4 .josh

.josh
  • Staff Alumni
  • .josh
  • 14,871 posts

Posted 26 August 2006 - 07:36 AM

my vote pretty much says it all. "not when it's intentionally left open."

Intentionally being the key word here.  why else would someone leave it open on purpose, except to allow other people to use it?
Did I help you? Feeling generous? Buy me lunch! 
Please, take the time and do some research and find out how much it would have cost you to get your help from a decent paid-for source. A "roll-of-the-dice" freelancer will charge you $5-$15/hr. A decent entry level freelancer will charge you around $15-30/hr. A professional will charge you anywhere from $50-$100/hr. An agency will charge anywhere from $100-$250/hr. Think about all this when soliciting for help here. Think about how much money you are making from the work you are asking for help on. No, we do not expect you to pay for the help given here, but donating a few bucks is a fraction of the cost of what you would have paid, shows your appreciation, helps motivate people to keep offering help without the pricetag, and helps make this a higher quality free-help community :)

#5 Kris

Kris
  • Staff Alumni
  • Advanced Member
  • 2,755 posts
  • LocationThe Internet

Posted 26 August 2006 - 12:28 PM

I would if it was intentionally left open.

#6 ober

ober
  • Staff Alumni
  • Advanced Member
  • 5,337 posts
  • LocationEast Coast, USA

Posted 26 August 2006 - 12:58 PM

Most people are too stupid to know how to lock it down, C_V.

Info: PHP Manual


#7 .josh

.josh
  • Staff Alumni
  • .josh
  • 14,871 posts

Posted 26 August 2006 - 04:42 PM

true, but again, keyword: intentional.  intentional means they left it open on purpose, which means they aren't too stupid to lock it down. They left it open on purpose, hence open invite.
Did I help you? Feeling generous? Buy me lunch! 
Please, take the time and do some research and find out how much it would have cost you to get your help from a decent paid-for source. A "roll-of-the-dice" freelancer will charge you $5-$15/hr. A decent entry level freelancer will charge you around $15-30/hr. A professional will charge you anywhere from $50-$100/hr. An agency will charge anywhere from $100-$250/hr. Think about all this when soliciting for help here. Think about how much money you are making from the work you are asking for help on. No, we do not expect you to pay for the help given here, but donating a few bucks is a fraction of the cost of what you would have paid, shows your appreciation, helps motivate people to keep offering help without the pricetag, and helps make this a higher quality free-help community :)

#8 Daniel0

Daniel0
  • Staff Alumni
  • Advanced Member
  • 11,956 posts

Posted 11 September 2006 - 07:53 AM

But how would you know if it's intentionally open? As ober says, many people don't know how to lock it down/encrypt it, so how would you know if it's open because they chose so, or if it's open because they don't know that it's open to all/don't know how to lock it?

Edit: I voted 'Yes (always)'.

#9 448191

448191
  • Staff Alumni
  • Advanced Member
  • 3,545 posts
  • LocationNetherlands

Posted 11 September 2006 - 09:55 AM

I said no. But not 'never'.

I might have voted 'when it's a emergency', because I do feel you shouldn't take to much advantage of someone else's stupidity. But emergency is such a heavy word.

Examples:
Ok:
You've just moved in and have to wait two weeks until you ISP has your connection set up.

If your neighbour finds out you pretend you're a novice and was 'very amazed' that internet was 'freely available' in this neighbourhood!

If he doesn't find out: after two weeks you try to get acquainted with your neighbours, you find out wich one has the unsecure network. You tell him 'someone' might be leeching his bandwith. You secure his network for him, and he is so gratefull that his connection is now once again at full speed, that he invites you to the yearly family barbecue! LOL....  :P

Not ok: You've just moved in and since your neighbour has his connection wide open you save a few bucks by abusing his stupidity untill he comes knocking at your door, wich will probably be never.

#10 .josh

.josh
  • Staff Alumni
  • .josh
  • 14,871 posts

Posted 11 September 2006 - 12:51 PM

But how would you know if it's intentionally open? As ober says, many people don't know how to lock it down/encrypt it, so how would you know if it's open because they chose so, or if it's open because they don't know that it's open to all/don't know how to lock it?

Edit: I voted 'Yes (always)'.

well i wouldn't know off hand, if i didn't know the person or anything, i wouldn't know if it was intentional or not.  But since the option states that it is intentionally left open, then logically I would have to know it was intentional. I didn't make the question. 

Question:  Is it "wrong" to piggyback off someone's wireless network?

Option 1 - "Yes" - this option would be that you would not do it, whether the user knew it was open or not. You believe it is wrong.

Option 2 - "No" - this option would be that you would do it, whether the user knew it was open or not. You do not believe it is wrong.

Option 3 - "Not when it's intentionally left open." - this option would be that you would do it, if they intentionally left it open. If you didn't know the person, never talked to him, saw no sign posted, etc etc.. then you wouldn't know if he intentionally left it open or not.  But option #3 states that it was intentionally left open, so logically, you must know the intentions. 

Option 4 = "Not when it's an emergency." - this option would be that you would do it, if it were an emergency. 
Did I help you? Feeling generous? Buy me lunch! 
Please, take the time and do some research and find out how much it would have cost you to get your help from a decent paid-for source. A "roll-of-the-dice" freelancer will charge you $5-$15/hr. A decent entry level freelancer will charge you around $15-30/hr. A professional will charge you anywhere from $50-$100/hr. An agency will charge anywhere from $100-$250/hr. Think about all this when soliciting for help here. Think about how much money you are making from the work you are asking for help on. No, we do not expect you to pay for the help given here, but donating a few bucks is a fraction of the cost of what you would have paid, shows your appreciation, helps motivate people to keep offering help without the pricetag, and helps make this a higher quality free-help community :)

#11 Daniel0

Daniel0
  • Staff Alumni
  • Advanced Member
  • 11,956 posts

Posted 11 September 2006 - 01:21 PM

Well, providing I knew that a connection was left intentionally open, then I probably would too (except if my connection were better).

#12 SharkBait

SharkBait
  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • Advanced Member
  • 845 posts
  • LocationMetro Vancouver, BC

Posted 04 January 2007 - 06:18 AM

I work for a WiFi Manufacturer so I know all the lovely tricks ;)

I remember one day when I was DJing at a private function I was able to log into 10 different wireless networks in the neighbourhood because people a) left their wireless routers with default passwords b) had no security enabled such as WEP or WPA c) had the router give out dynamic addresses to anyone who connected to.

Though I could get more into it but it is nice to have free internet access wherever I am. Alot of businesses are setting up free HotSpots (like Cafe's etc).

#13 JayBachatero

JayBachatero
  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • Advanced Member
  • 296 posts
  • LocationQueens NY

Posted 19 January 2007 - 03:02 PM

It depends.  Before I got my wireless router I used to pick up signal when I was playing my PSP, so I used to go online.  That was once in a while though.
JayBachatero
SMF Developer && Converter Specialist

#14 obsidian

obsidian
  • Staff Alumni
  • Advanced Member
  • 3,202 posts
  • LocationSeattle, WA

Posted 19 January 2007 - 04:02 PM

I voted for the intentially left open usage. If you vote "no, never," you're even ruling out the fact when you go visit someone and they have a wireless access point in their house. I went to visit my brother over the holidays, and I was able to "piggyback" on his access while visiting there. Now, in his case, I helped him lock it down when I left, but I didn't pay for his internet service, and I certainly don't feel it's wrong to use it when I'm there.

I definitely think there are a few things that would keep me from piggybacking on someone unbeknown to them, though:

1. If I'm doing anything corporately related (ie, making money) - at this point, I feel it's right for me to either be using someone's advertised free service (ie, WiFi or a friend's house) or to pay for my own.

2. If the user is doing anything illegal.

3. If the user is doing something that would violate the values of the provider. For instance, I definitely would have a problem with someone piggybacking on my connection and surfing porn sites all day, because with tracing, it would all come back to me.

My 2 cents.
You can't win, you can't lose, you can't break even... you can't even get out of the game.

<?php
while (count($life->getQuestions()) > 0)
{   $life->study(); } ?>
  LINKS: PHP: Manual MySQL: Manual PostgreSQL: Manual (X)HTML: Validate It! CSS: A List Apart | IE bug fixes | Zen Garden | Validate It! JavaScript: Reference Cards RegEx: Everything RegEx

#15 micah1701

micah1701
  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • Advanced Member
  • 613 posts
  • LocationEllington, CT USA

Posted 19 January 2007 - 05:01 PM

i live in an apartment building and apparently have very stupid neighbors.  At any given time I have 3 or 4 open connections.  Makes me wonder why I waste $39.95 a month for my own connection!

I personally lock mine down because I don't want to share my bandwidth or pay $40/month so some cheap dope can get free internet access when I have to pay.  Likewise, I generally don't steal my neighbors access unless there is some problem with my own home network and I need internet access to diagnose.

I think its wrong to piggyback when the wi-fi owner has not clearly intended open use.  If its a coffee shop or hotel then obviously thats fine. 

Would you steal someone's car if they left the key's in the ignition?  Its the same moral question.
"Confidence in the face of risk."

#16 Cep

Cep
  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • Advanced Member
  • 539 posts
  • LocationOn a boat in the middle of nowhere

Posted 25 January 2007 - 10:01 AM

I'd say yes as you could be using that persons network to do illegal things. You are also stealling that persons service and bandwidth.


I'd say if its open its a free for all. Yes you could say your stealing their bandwidth but I kind of see it the same as a man in the street with hundreds of 5 pound notes in his open hands waiting to see what happens as people walk by him.

If you don't want people to use your bandwidth you should do something about it, ignorance is not an excuse.
Thanks Cep

#17 TheFilmGod

TheFilmGod
  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • Advanced Member
  • 1,941 posts
  • LocationNew Jersey

Posted 09 April 2007 - 01:27 AM

Why not piggyback?
The future is here.

#18 Guest_kilbad_*

Guest_kilbad_*
  • Guests

Posted 20 April 2007 - 08:02 PM

That is what this thread is all about!

#19 redbullmarky

redbullmarky
  • Staff Alumni
  • Advanced Member
  • 2,863 posts
  • LocationBedfordshire, England

Posted 20 April 2007 - 09:23 PM

ahh. thanks for the bump - it prompted me of a story I saw recently:

http://news.bbc.co.u...rcs/6565079.stm

it says that it's the first case of its kind, but shouldnt be long before i guess it's a bit more widespread. it's only when you get into the consequences of letting someone piggyback your network that you realise ALL the reasons why you should lock it down...
"you have to keep pissing in the wind to learn how to keep your shoes dry..."

I say old chap, that is rather amusing!

#20 obsidian

obsidian
  • Staff Alumni
  • Advanced Member
  • 3,202 posts
  • LocationSeattle, WA

Posted 23 April 2007 - 12:30 PM

it's only when you get into the consequences of letting someone piggyback your network that you realise ALL the reasons why you should lock it down...


I don't know... based on that article, it almost makes me want to leave mine open and wait outside in the bushes to see what happens ;) ... Seems like, at least in this case, it was the people using the network that were in trouble, not the network owners.
You can't win, you can't lose, you can't break even... you can't even get out of the game.

<?php
while (count($life->getQuestions()) > 0)
{   $life->study(); } ?>
  LINKS: PHP: Manual MySQL: Manual PostgreSQL: Manual (X)HTML: Validate It! CSS: A List Apart | IE bug fixes | Zen Garden | Validate It! JavaScript: Reference Cards RegEx: Everything RegEx




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users