Windows 95 and Cyrillic
Posted 26 January 2013 - 08:25 PM
I don't use a windows system more than 13 years.
So, I have a windows 95 but just forgot how to install Cyrillic layout into it.
I wrote a message to the microsoft support service for now without any response.
Does someone have an idea?
Posted 27 January 2013 - 01:22 PM
You're kidding, right? Microsoft stopped supporting Windows 95 more than a decade ago.
Should I know it ???
Well, if someone ask me whether Microsoft still supports 98, 2000, millenium, XP, I'm not sure that I can give him a correct answer, the same I could say for OS's X.
Anyways, thank you for reply, so I found a patch for 95 and 98 into the web - http://virusdefence....or-windows.html
Posted 27 January 2013 - 02:07 PM
Well, if someone ask me whether Microsoft still supports 98, 2000, millenium, XP, I'm not sure that I can give him a correct answer
Those answers would be no, no, no, and almost no.
Did I help you out? Feeling generous? I accept tips via Bitcoin @ 14mDxaob8Jgdg52scDbvf3uaeR61tB2yC7
Posted 27 January 2013 - 02:27 PM
I think the question here is why the f*** are you using windows 95? Why not use a newer version, or linux distro?
Because of the hardware on the machine.
Posted 27 January 2013 - 02:41 PM
Slax, for instance, is one such distro. Based upon Slackware, and having lots of modules available for quick and easy installation, it's my favourite pocket Linux distro. There are multiple other such distros as well, such as Puppy Linux, Lubuntu and even DamnSmallLinux.
Searching will almost guaranteed provide you with lots more options. All more secure, generally faster, and way more modern than W95.
Edited by Christian F., 27 January 2013 - 02:41 PM.
Posted 27 January 2013 - 02:48 PM
For example: Red Hat 7.x runs much, much faster than win 95, but I'm using 95 b/s of the software on that machine.
Edited by jazzman1, 27 January 2013 - 02:54 PM.
Posted 27 January 2013 - 02:55 PM
Posted 27 January 2013 - 03:00 PM
There is no possible way to use Wine or Crossover under linux system;)
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users