Jump to content

dieselmachine

New Members
  • Posts

    2
  • Joined

  • Last visited

    Never

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling

dieselmachine's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/5)

0

Reputation

  1. [!--quoteo(post=373539:date=May 13 2006, 10:04 AM:name=shoz)--][div class=\'quotetop\']QUOTE(shoz @ May 13 2006, 10:04 AM) [snapback]373539[/snapback][/div][div class=\'quotemain\'][!--quotec--] You want to use [a href=\"http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/4.1/en/group-by-functions-and-modifiers.html\" target=\"_blank\"]GROUP BY[/a]. [!--sql--][div class=\'sqltop\']SQL[/div][div class=\'sqlmain\'][!--sql1--][span style=\'color:blue;font-weight:bold\']SELECT[/span] rank, [color=blue]COUNT[/color](*) [color=green]AS[/color] total [color=green]FROM[/color] [color=orange]users[/color] GROUP BY rank [!--sql2--][/div][!--sql3--] [/quote] You are totally awesome, thanks a ton dude!
  2. I am doing some volunteer work on a site that uses a lot of mysql databases, and while looking through the files for code to optimize, i found a script which does this: (for background, there is a table called users full of user accounts, and each one has a rank. there are 8 different ranks, and the purpose of this script is to tally how many users are of each rank and display the info). i'm still kind of new to php/mysql, so if my syntax is a bit off, forgive me. It's not the syntax I really care about, just the question of runtime. SELECT count(*) as total1 FROM users WHERE rank='1' //send query, get row $level1users = row['total1']; SELECT count(*) as total2 FROM users WHERE rank='2' //send query, get row $level2users = row['total2']; ... and so on, up to 8. My question is, could I save time by running a single iteration through the table and incrementing 8 different variables based on the value of 'rank'? It seems to me this current script is going through the entire table 8 different times, which (in my mind) makes me think it could be optimized. I'm thinking: SELECT rank FROM users; //send query while{ array[$row['rank']]++; } then at the end, print the 8 variables in the array. Would this be more efficient? Thanks in advance for any guidance.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.