Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I got a requirement where I need to define a MySQL database setup (using two databases if best which is reason for question).

Here's the objective:

 

1st (primary task): setup a MySQL db that will allow multiple websites (email capture forms) to log or save emails to that database (with minimum latency).

Note: form validation, per website, will ensure the emails are properly formatted so only MySQL INSERT required for this (1st) db - no other processing in this regard.

 

2nd (secondary task): That 1st MySQL db which will be under constant load - receiving emails from various sites (this hourly number could average between 10 to twenty-five thousand which is why I need to offline this task solely to one db <I think>). However, as new emails are logged to this (1st) db, I need to then batch those saved records over to a 2nd db which will be performing a series of functions - processing the leads along with number crunching (data mining, etc...)

 

Illustration the setup below: once record logged in DB1 (which is required to house ALL data - long-term; DB2 only housing a short-interval of incoming records - this to reduce processing on new entries).

 

<Objective: get records over to DB2 without hampering DB1 on incoming INSERTS from websites>

DB1 ===> DB2

SQL INSERT

 

(Objective: DB1 needs to pass records over to DB2 while still capturing incoming emails with the lowest possible latency for end-user).

-----

 

Q: Should I setup transactions between DB1 & DB2 to pass the records into DB2 which - i think would induce latency back on DB1 b/c it will pause taking new emails while waiting for DB2 to accept or ignore new entries to that DB (FYI: DB2 will 'ignore' duplicate email entries).

 

Or

 

Is there a better way to batch the records from DB1 over to DB2 in a way DB1 won't get bogged down with that process so it continues to receive new emails - whcih will be constant and in high volume.

 

Comments welcome and I will elaborate more if/when required to help understand the objective.

Thanks!

FYI: I just had a thought - still welcome comments and/or sugggestions - but think i see a way to make this less complicated:

 

Instead of haveing two (separate) Db's, being the 1st DB is only capturing incoming emails ONLY; then passing them to the 2nd DB which will be the actual work-horse.

I'm thinking only have one DB (period) and create a specific table that will simply log all incoming entries then I can query that table to process those records - marking each with a flag as the server process each.

 

This will cut out alot of 'transit' latency and reduce CPU processing right off the bat!

Let me know thoughts and if there is a better solution.

 

Thx!

This thread is more than a year old. Please don't revive it unless you have something important to add.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.