jep Posted March 10, 2014 Share Posted March 10, 2014 (edited) Hi to everyone and sorry for my bad english... there is a table, ServErog (service) wich is releaded to other 4 tables ServA, ServB, ServC, ServD (they are different non uniformable services) with two key, servtype (type of service) and type_id (numeric id from one of the 4 service table) Structure (simplyficaded): ServErog mysql> select * from ServErog +----+-------+----------+------+ | idSE | servtype | type_id | +----+-------+----------+------+ | 1 | 1 | 1 | | 2 | 2 | 1 | | 3 | 4 | 1 | | 4 | 3 | 1 | | 5 | 1 | 2 | +----+-------+----------+-------+ ServA mysql> select * from ServA +----+-------+----------+------+ | idSA | service_code | type | |+----+-------+----------+------+ | 1 | codice bla | 1 | | 2 | codice ecc | 1 | | 3 | bla bla | 1 | +----+-------+----------+------+ ServB mysql> select * from ServB +----+-------+----------+------+ | idSB | service_code | type | +----+-------+----------+------+ | 1 | codice bla | 2 | | 2 | codice ecc | 2 | | 3 | bla bla | 2 | +----+-------+----------+------+ ServC mysql> select * from ServC +----+-------+----------+------+ | idSC | service_code | type | +----+-------+----------+------+ | 1 | codice bla | 3 | | 2 | codice ecc | 3 | | 3 | bla bla | 3 | +----+-------+----------+------+ ServD mysql> select * from ServD +----+-------+----------+------+ | idSA | service_code | type | +----+-------+----------+------+ | 1 | codice bla | 4 | | 2 | codice ecc | 4 | | 3 | bla bla | 4 | +----+-------+----------+------+ Left Join Select ServErog.idSE, ServErog.servtype, ServErog.typeid, ServA.idSA, ServA.type, ServB.idSB, ServB.type, Serv.idSA, Serv.type, ServD.idSA, ServD.type From ServErog Left Join ServA On ServErog.servtype = ServA.type And ServA.idSA = ServErog.typeid Left Join ServB On ServErog.servtype = ServB.type And ServB.idSB = ServErog.typeid Left Join ServC On ServErog.servtype = ServC.type And ServC.idSC = ServErog.typeid Left Join ServD On ServErog.servtype = ServD.type And ServD.idSD = ServErog.typeid Order By ServErog.idSE +----+-------+----------+------+------+------+---------+ | idSE | servtype | type_id | idSA | idSB | idSC | idSD | +----+-------+----------+------+------+------+---------+ | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | null | null | null | | 2 | 2 | 1 | null | 1 | null | null | | 3 | 4 | 1 | null | null | null | 1 | | 4 | 3 | 1 | null | null | 1 | null | | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | null | null | null | +----+-------+----------+------+------+ This retur all records releaded with ServErog. Perfect! Now I need to show all record from ServA, ServB, ServC, ServD NOT PRESENT in ServErog. It's like an inverse of the precedent Join. I've tried with right join, with idSE is null but without result This is what I looking for this example: +----+-------+----------+------+ | idSA | idSB | idSC | idSD| +----+-------+----------+------+ | 3 | null | null | null | | null | 2 | null | null | | null | 3 | null | null | | null | null | 2 | null | | null | null | 3 | null | | null | null | null | 2 | | null | null | null | 3 | +----+-------+----------+------+ Edited March 10, 2014 by Zane Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jep Posted March 12, 2014 Author Share Posted March 12, 2014 it's impossible or it's too simple? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Psycho Posted March 12, 2014 Share Posted March 12, 2014 Why do you have separate tables for ServA, ServB, etc.? You include a column in each with is defining the 'type' already. All these records belong in ONE table such as this (let's just call it "Serv"): +------+---------------+------+ | idS | service_code | type | +------+---------------+------+ | 1 | codice blaA | 1 | | 2 | codice eccA | 1 | | 3 | bla blaA | 1 | | 4 | codice blaB | 2 | | 5 | codice eccB | 2 | | 6 | bla blaB | 2 | | 7 | codice blaC | 3 | | 8 | codice eccC | 3 | | 9 | bla blaC | 3 | | 10 | codice blaD | 4 | | 11 | codice eccD | 4 | | 12 | bla blaD | 4 | +------+---------------+------+ Then your original query will get all the associated records in a much simpler way SELECT ServErog.idSE, ServErog.servtype, ServErog.typeid, Serv.idS, Serv.type FROM ServErog LEFT JOIN Serv On ServErog.servtype = Serv.type AND ServErog.typeid = Serv.idS ORDER BY ServErog.idSE, Serv.type You can determine in the processing which types are included and which ones are not. Then to get all the ones not associated with a record in ServErog you would run something like this SELECT Serv.idS, Serv.service_code, Serv.type FROM Serv LEFT JOIN ServErog On ServErog.servtype = Serv.type AND ServErog.typeid = Serv.idS WHERE ServErog.idSE IS NULL Or, if you wanted the ones not associated with a specific ServErog record SELECT Serv.idS, Serv.service_code, Serv.type FROM Serv LEFT JOIN ServErog On ServErog.servtype = Serv.type AND ServErog.typeid = Serv.idS AND ServErog.idSE = $id WHERE ServErog.idSE IS NULL With what you have, to get all the records from four tables in a single result set would take a more complicated UNION type query. Maybe something like: SELECT ServA.idS, ServA.service_code, ServA.type FROM ServA LEFT JOIN ServErog On ServErog.servtype = Serv.type AND ServErog.typeid = Serv.idS WHERE ServErog.idSE IS NULL UNION SELECT ServA.idS, ServA.service_code, ServA.type FROM ServA LEFT JOIN ServErog On ServErog.servtype = Serv.type AND ServErog.typeid = Serv.idS WHERE ServErog.idSE IS NULL UNION SELECT ServA.idS, ServA.service_code, ServA.type FROM ServA LEFT JOIN ServErog On ServErog.servtype = Serv.type AND ServErog.typeid = Serv.idS WHERE ServErog.idSE IS NULL UNION SELECT ServA.idS, ServA.service_code, ServA.type FROM ServA LEFT JOIN ServErog On ServErog.servtype = Serv.type AND ServErog.typeid = Serv.idS WHERE ServErog.idSE IS NULL When you have to create such complicated queries to get what should be something simple, it is an indication that the DB structure is not right. Put all the Serv records into a single table. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jep Posted March 12, 2014 Author Share Posted March 12, 2014 Thank for answer Psycho! You're right but I cant create (merge) the service tables (servA, servB, serC, servD) in one because they are very difference each other*. servA contains information about course in a classroomservB contains information about consultancy servC contains information about elearning servD contains information about voucher They have a lot of different field and my example question are a simplification of them with only some common field. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jep Posted March 12, 2014 Author Share Posted March 12, 2014 I've already tried to make an UNION command but without result (how can put different name of columns in the four Select?) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Psycho Posted March 12, 2014 Share Posted March 12, 2014 UNION queries have specific requirements such as each query must return the same number of fields and each field must be the same 'type". You need to make sure to create them to meet that requirement. You're right but I cant create (merge) the service tables (servA, servB, serC, servD) in one because they are very difference each other*. servA contains information about course in a classroomservB contains information about consultancy servC contains information about elearning servD contains information about voucher Yes, you can merge the 'common' data for those four tables. You could leave those four tables exactly as they are, but remove the service_code value. Then use a single the Serv table as I showed above. That way you have one table for all the common data which you can use for JOINing on the ServErog table and can additionally JOIN out to those individual table for the additional info. I can't really know what the best way is to set these up without understanding the entire project (which I don't want to do), but am only saying that what you just stated doesn't preclude you from doing it that way. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jep Posted March 12, 2014 Author Share Posted March 12, 2014 ...(which I don't want to do)... Ok Psycho, now I've resolved the UNION clause and show what I need. I'm thinking about your consideration and making some tests. thank you! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.