Destramic Posted September 2, 2015 Share Posted September 2, 2015 hey guys i've made alterations to my query below, previously it had a lot of sub queries which was unnecessary as it can all be achieved by a join instead. but this query brings back the wrong highest_bidder and highest_bidders_id which is brought from my bid and users table if i do a simple query like this: SELECT b.bid_id, u.user_id, u.username, b.price FROM bids b LEFT JOIN users u ON u.user_id = b.user_id ORDER BY b.price DESC, b.created_timestamp DESC, b.bid_id DESC LIMIT 1 than i get the correct results as i should with this big query below. SELECT i.item_id, i.user_id, i.title, i.buy_now, i.auction, i.condition, i.offers_accepted, i.free_delivery, i.free_delivery_condition, i.collection, i.collection_only, i.p_and_p, i.buy_now_price, i.quantity, i.description, (i.quantity - count(ip.item_id)) AS `quantity_available`, COUNT(ip.item_id) AS `quantity_sold`, io2.offer_price, u.username AS `seller`, DATE_FORMAT(u.timestamp, '%d/%m/%y') AS `member_since`, @bid_increment := bi.increment AS `bid_increment`, @current_auction_price := IF (b.price IS NULL, i.starting_price, b.price) AS `current_auction_price`, TRUNCATE((@current_auction_price + @bid_increment), 2) AS `minimum_bid`, ua.town_city, ua.country, ua.continent, u2.username AS `highest_bidder`, u2.user_id AS `highest_bidder_id`, io2.quantity AS `quantity_offer`, LOWER(c.country_code) AS `sellers_country_code`, COUNT(DISTINCT io.item_offer_id) AS `offer_count`, CONCAT(FORMAT(((SUM(uf.positive + uf.neutral) - uf.negative) / count(uf.user_feedback_id) * 100), 2), '%') AS `sellers_feedback_percentage`, ROUND(SUM((uf.positive * 1) + (uf.neutral * 0.5)) - (uf.negative * 1), 0) AS `sellers_feedback_score`, COUNT(DISTINCT b.bid_id) AS `bid_count`, COUNT(DISTINCT uiw.user_item_wish_id) AS `wish_count`, COUNT(DISTINCT uiwa.user_item_watch_id) AS `watch_count`, CONCAT_WS(', ', ua.town_city, ua.county, ua.country) AS `location`, NOW() AS `server_time`, @timestamp := CONVERT_TZ(DATE_ADD(i.start_timestamp, INTERVAL concat(i.listing_duration) DAY), '+00:00', '+00:00') AS `timestamp`, DATE_FORMAT(@timestamp, '%D, %M at %h:%i %p') AS `end_timestamp`, (SELECT COUNT(reported_item_id) FROM reported_items WHERE item_id = i.item_id AND user_id = :user_id) AS `reported`, (SELECT COUNT(item_id) FROM user_item_wishes WHERE item_id = i.item_id AND user_id = :user_id) AS `wished`, (SELECT COUNT(item_id) FROM user_item_watches WHERE item_id = i.item_id AND user_id = :user_id) AS `watched`, (SELECT COUNT(user_follower_id) FROM user_followers WHERE user_id = i.user_id AND follower_id = :user_id) AS `followed`, (SELECT COUNT(DISTINCT(ip_address)) FROM statistics WHERE DATE_ADD(visited, INTERVAL 2 HOUR) >= now()) AS `period_last_visited`, (SELECT COUNT(DISTINCT(ip_address)) FROM statistics WHERE uri = '/item/1') AS `views`, IF (i.start_timestamp >= now(), true, false) AS `ended`, CASE WHEN (:latitude IS NOT NULL AND :longitude IS NOT NULL AND u.latitude IS NOT NULL AND u.longitude IS NOT NULL) THEN @distance := (SELECT (IF(:distance_unit = 'Kilometers', 6371, 3959) * 2 * ASIN(SQRT(POWER(SIN((:latitude- u.latitude) * pi()/180 / 2), 2) + COS(:latitude * pi()/180) * COS(u.latitude * pi()/180) * POWER(SIN((:longitude - u.longitude) * pi()/180 / 2), 2))))) END, @distance_unit := IF (@distance >= 1, IF (@distance < 2, REPLACE (:distance_unit, 's', ''), @distance_unit), :distance_unit), IF (@distance, CONCAT(TRUNCATE(@distance, 0), space(1) , @distance_unit), 'Unknown Distance') AS `distance` FROM items i LEFT JOIN users u ON u.user_id = i.user_id LEFT JOIN item_purchases ip ON ip.item_id = i.item_id LEFT JOIN user_item_wishes uiw ON uiw.item_id = i.item_id LEFT JOIN user_item_watches uiwa ON uiwa.item_id = i.item_id LEFT JOIN user_addresses ua ON ua.user_id = i.user_id LEFT JOIN item_addresses ia ON ia.user_address_id = ua.user_address_id LEFT JOIN countries c ON c.country_name = ua.country LEFT JOIN item_offers io ON io.item_id = i.item_id LEFT JOIN users_feedback uf ON uf.user_id = i.user_id LEFT JOIN item_offers io2 ON io2.user_id = i.user_id LEFT JOIN bids b ON b.item_id = i.item_id LEFT JOIN users u2 ON u2.user_id = b.user_id LEFT JOIN bid_increments bi ON b.price BETWEEN bi.price_from AND bi.price_to WHERE i.item_id = :item_id AND ia.user_address_id = i.user_address_id AND uf.seller = '1' ORDER BY b.price DESC, b.created_timestamp DESC, b.bid_id DESC the joins and the order by are correct so i dont understand why the query is producing the wrong highest bidder if anyone know why please? also any general advice on this query, how i should do things would be greatly welcomed. thank you Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Destramic Posted September 4, 2015 Author Share Posted September 4, 2015 no views? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Destramic Posted September 5, 2015 Author Share Posted September 5, 2015 with a lot of playing about i've narrowed it down to these columns causing the problem (i.quantity - count(ip.item_id)) AS `quantity_available`, COUNT(ip.item_id) AS `quantity_sold`, io2.quantity AS `quantity_offer`, COUNT(DISTINCT io.item_offer_id) AS `offer_count`, CONCAT(FORMAT(((SUM(uf.positive + uf.neutral) - uf.negative) / count(uf.user_feedback_id) * 100), 2), '%') AS `sellers_feedback_percentage`, ROUND(SUM((uf.positive * 1) + (uf.neutral * 0.5)) - (uf.negative * 1), 0) AS `sellers_feedback_score`, COUNT(DISTINCT b.bid_id) AS `bid_count`, COUNT(DISTINCT uiw.user_item_wish_id) AS `wish_count`, COUNT(DISTINCT uiwa.user_item_watch_id) AS `watch_count`, when these lines are taken away from my query i get the correct results...why when i add them the highest bidder changes? thank you Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barand Posted September 6, 2015 Share Posted September 6, 2015 Probably because you are using aggregation functions without a GROUP BY. Does your query only produce a single row? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Destramic Posted September 6, 2015 Author Share Posted September 6, 2015 (edited) yes its only is to produce one row by i.item_id Edited September 6, 2015 by Destramic Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barand Posted September 6, 2015 Share Posted September 6, 2015 Without a GROUP BY clause the aggregations will be for the whole table and non-aggregated fields will likely be whatever happened to be in those columns in the first record in the table. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Destramic Posted September 12, 2015 Author Share Posted September 12, 2015 ok barand i'll give it a whirl...been busy reconstructing my database after all your advise...hopefully be able to play around with query again tomorrow Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.