Jump to content

Oracle time-travelling?


Feenix566

Recommended Posts

I've come across a situation where PHP and Oracle are apparently experiencing a time-dilation effect.

 

I'm writing code for user authentication. We track login sessions. First, it searches for open login sessions, and closes them. Then, it creates a new open login session. Here's pseudocode:

 

<?

$get_logins = OCIParse($DB, "select login_id from login where user_id = :user_id and logoutdate is null");

ocibindbyname($get_logins, ":user_id", $user_id);

if(!OCIExecute($get_logins))

  exit("failed to search for open logins");

while($login = oci_fetch_array($get_logins)){

  $update = OCIParse($DB, "update login set logoutdate = sysdate where login_id = :login_id");

  ocibindbyname($update, ":login_id", $login['LOGIN_ID']);

  echo "closing login {$login['LOGIN_ID']}\n";

  if(!OCIExecute($update))

      exit("failed to close login");

  OCIFreeStatement($update);

}

OCIFreeStatement($get_logins);

 

$insert = OCIParse($DB, "insert into login(user_id, logindate)values(:user_id,sysdate)returning login_id into :login_id");

ocibindbyname($insert, ":user_id", $user_id);

ocibindbyname($insert, ":login_id", $login_id, 32);

if(!OCIExecute($insert))

  exit("failed to create new login");

OCIFreeStatement($insert);

 

echo "created login $login_id";

?>

 

Now, this doesn't happen every time I run it, only about one in three times. It will actually update the login before it makes it! It prints out the debugging message saying it's updating the login, then it prints out the message saying it made the login, and the login_id's are the same number!!! So when the script is done running, the user doesn't have an open session, and subsequently is asked to log in again.

 

 

The only explanation I can think of is that PHP is skipping over the while loop because it's waiting for Oracle to return the results of the query. PHP must be executing the code after the while loop, then coming back and executing the loop on the results of the query, which unfortunately includes the record created by the code after the loop. Am I correct? Is there a way to avoid this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is more than a year old. Please don't revive it unless you have something important to add.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.