cgm225 Posted October 5, 2007 Share Posted October 5, 2007 So I wrote a gallery script I use on my website, and it provides a small thumbnail --> medium thumbnail --> and then the full image (here is an example gallery); however, server space is starting to become an issue, and so I was thinking I would simply have small and medium images and NO full size images (since the full images do not appear in the website wrapper, and do not fit within most browser windows (though, some will resize it down to fit)). Therefore, I wanted to get everyones opinion:: If you had to speculate, do you think people are looking at the full size images all that often? As far as the user experience is concerned, do you think it would be ok to have the medium size thumbnail as the largest avalible image? Thank you all in advance! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bilis_money Posted October 5, 2007 Share Posted October 5, 2007 I think they are fine. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GingerRobot Posted October 5, 2007 Share Posted October 5, 2007 It certainly seems like overkill to have 3 sizes to me. Personally, i think the current medium sized images could afford to be larger. You could then certainly get rid of the largest size. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.