moberemk

Flash Video seems to be the method of choice, yes. Just do a quick google search for "dynamic flash video player tutorial" and you should find a good one for making it.

Wow. That really came out bitter-sounding. Also, as you might have noticed, the internet is heading more towards those lines, yes. People aren't around to be impressed by your pretty design (unless the whole point is to demonstrate a pretty design) they're there to read your content. Content happens to show up well on a light background. Also, graphics heavy both increase load times and often just don't come out that well. This is all just in my humble opinion, by the way.

Sorry, but that front page navigation system-thingy just isn't very good. At all. It's the kind of thing that makes people give up on a website at first glance. Here's an article you might want to take a look at: [a href=\"http://www.webpagesthatsuck.com/mysterymeatnavigation.html\" target=\"_blank\"]http://www.webpagesthatsuck.com/mysterymeatnavigation.html[/a]

Personally? I find your site unprofessional and similar to the style of the late 90's. It's a very graphics-heavy site, and the metallic gradients everywhere is one of my least-favorite design ideas. It isn't bad, but for a different kind of site.

The images behind the titles of the little blocks on the side. Speaking of which, you should make those blocks have borders around them. It would help separate them from the content.

At the very bottom of your element that you're using to contain the result, just put in an empty <div> tag with the style property set to clear: both;. I've also got a link to an alternate way to do it: [a href=\"http://www.positioniseverything.net/easyclearing.html\" target=\"_blank\"]http://www.positioniseverything.net/easyclearing.html[/a]

Was this all generated by Dreameaver, or did you edit any of it? Because to show only one record, all you have to do is not apply a repeat region.

Hmm... Okay, I retract my statement then. I stand corrected. I never did think that there were that many people who used Opera though... Guess I'll have to start testing in it then. As for the site, I noticed something: you use image rollovers for your navbar. Isn't that something that you could do much better with CSS? And without so much messy javascript code that Dreamweaver wrote for you?

If this is a script that you're modifying, should this be in the [b]Third-Party Scripts[/b] forum?

Ober, just have this to say: you are the only person I know who actually uses Opera.

Two things. One, you're using IDs instead of classes. Two, you need to apply a clearfix at the bottom of your block. Just add a div with clear: both; to keep it from sticking out.

That is really, really weird. I don't think that I've ever seen any bugs like that before... Well, in cases of weird errors like this, could you attach the code for your navbar, as well as your Dreamweaver version number?

That's what it's supposed to do, actually. It isn't doing anything wrong; rather, you are. You need to specify that the dateblocks float to the left of your text by giving them the float: left; property.

Like he said, just change it from POSTs to GETs. And again, upgrading = good.

How did you get this topic? It's been dead for months now.

Do you actually have enough records for two pages? Also, does the navbar show the first/next buttons?

I agree that that design does look better, but I don't think that it's fully stealing. His design is a lot... different, that's for sure.

Your column titles are fixed-width, right? How about you make the background images have a rounded end to them? Also, put a little space between your side blocks and the header.

I have to say, having text jump a little over when I'm hovering isn't one of my favorite design techniques. It's a good start, but when I look at the header (a nice nature scene) and then go to a grey/black site, it feels disjointed.

Ober's evil twin, hmm? Ironically, that's one of the nicer things people have said to me! That being said, I definitely agree! But then, it is my comment after all...

The text of your upper nav is hard to read on those images. Your code is a hideous mismatch of uppercasing and lowecasing. And last, but far from least, there is no other pages to look at.

Go to your Connections panel. It should be under "Stored Procedures".

You've added some interesting touches to be sure. I wouldn't say that it looks a lot better, but it does look better then before. Which is odd, because I don't see too many new things.

This looks like a Javascript thing more then anything. Unless you moved the navigation anywhere, in which case maybe it's the lack of relative positioning.

That's not right. That selector would say "apply the same thing to the something class, the td tag, and the th tag." That wouldn't work, would it?