discomatt Posted October 21, 2008 Share Posted October 21, 2008 [quote author=genericnumber1 link=topic=221525.msg1020246#msg1020246 I don't want to read someone's code where they aren't consistent.. it looks amateur, messy, and it makes the code harder to read. I wasn't referring to a single author, I was talking more about creating a convention. Sloppy code is different than a developer not following your preferences But even then, changing case for function/class names really isn't THAT sloppy. What ticks me off is when devs mix camelHump() and under_score() naming Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
genericnumber1 Posted October 21, 2008 Share Posted October 21, 2008 But even then, changing case for function/class names really isn't THAT sloppy. I disagree What ticks me off is when devs mix camelHump() and under_score() naming I agree Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alexweber15 Posted October 21, 2008 Author Share Posted October 21, 2008 What ticks me off is when devs mix camelHump() and under_score() naming you mean mixing between the two for variables and/or functions? or in general? as in would it tick you off if ALL variables used under_score() naming and ALL functions used camelCase() ? just wondering Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
discomatt Posted October 21, 2008 Share Posted October 21, 2008 No, that's not mixed... but even then... variables differ from functions by having a '$' in front of them.. why use different naming standards? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.