Goldeneye Posted December 24, 2009 Share Posted December 24, 2009 Hello! I have a text-formatting function which looks for any [img=] tag and parses them into images -- which works exactly as it should. But when I try add in some functionality to resize the image if it exceeds a certain width and height, I get an error -- the error being: Warning: getimagesize($1) [function.getimagesize]: failed to open stream: No such file or directory... I know why it's getting this error. This error is occurring because the function getimagesize is taking the $1 literally. Is there anyway to get around this? <?php function format($str) { $str = trim($str); $str = stripslashes($str); $str = htmlentities($str, ENT_COMPAT, 'UTF-8'); $str = nl2br($str); $formats = array( '/\[img=(.*?)\]/si' => ((current(getimagesize('$1')) > $_CL['img']['maxwidth']) && (next(getimagesize('$1')) > $_CL['img']['maxheight'])) ? '<a href="$1" class="image"><img src="$1" class="image"></a>' : '<a href="$1"><img src="$1" class="image"></a>',//'<img src="$1" class="image">', ); $str = preg_replace(array_keys($formats), $formats, $str); return $str; } ?> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.josh Posted December 25, 2009 Share Posted December 25, 2009 php is trying to execute getimagesize at the time that you are assigning the value to the array element, not when you are actually performing the preg_replace. Outside of preg_replace, $1 means nothing but a literal $1 so getimagesize is trying to find a file literally called '$1' You are going to have to reorganize your code. One way to do it would be to wrap the entire array element value in quotes (whole thing, function calls and all, so none of that stuff gets executed; php treats it as just some random string for now), and use the e modifier for preg_replace, which will cause php to parse the replacement argument in preg_replace as if you were running eval. Doing it this way will have that whole value "...getimagesize('$1')..." evaluated as php code, but since it is actually evaluated inside the preg_replace call, $1 will actually mean something. The danger to doing this though is if your preg_replace fails to make a match and capture, or if it captures something unexpected, or if the image just doesn't exist, you're going to get the same error thrown up at you, and there's nothing you can do to safeguard against that. In light of that concern, another, better way to do it would be to first preg_match for the pattern and then use the returned value from that, instead of $1. Somewhere in-between your preg_match and getimagesize, you can check to see if the image actually exists, before you try to getimagesize it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goldeneye Posted December 25, 2009 Author Share Posted December 25, 2009 Thank you for pointing me in the right direction Crayon Violent! I have it working just as it should now with this: <?php if(preg_match_all('/\[img=(.*?)\]/si', $str, $match)) foreach($match[1] as $url) if($img = @getimagesize($url)) $str = str_replace('[img='.$url.']', (($img[0] > $_CL['img']['maxwidth']) && ($img[1] > $_CL['img']['maxheight'])) ? '<a href="'.$url.'" class="image"><img src="'.$url.'" class="image"></a>' : '<a href="'.$url.'"><img src="'.$url.'" class="image"></a>', $str); ?> With that preg_match_all, I get a two-dimensional array with the first dimension holding all the matches with the text surrounding the subpattern () and the second dimension simply holds the matched URL. I notice that when loading a page while using this code-snippet, the loading-process seems to hang for about 1 or 2 seconds. Is any way to lessen that hang-time? The load-time isn't occurring because of Error-Suppressor prepended to getimagesize, is it? Or does this hang-time occur because of something outside of my control (such as the remote-server's response time)? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daniel0 Posted December 25, 2009 Share Posted December 25, 2009 I'd use preg_replace_callback. Check out the examples in the manual. It should be easy to see how you can use it for this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goldeneye Posted December 26, 2009 Author Share Posted December 26, 2009 You know, I suspected preg_replace_callback would be the answer. I will attempt to get it working with preg_replace_callback. My script doesn't hang (when loading) anymore (I made a few changes from the code I posted above) but the way I'm doing it now just seems very poor so I'm going to attempt to get this working with preg_replace_callback instead. Thank you, Crayon Violent and Daniel0! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.