leafface Posted September 14, 2007 Share Posted September 14, 2007 I'll make it as illustrative as i can. Tables: main +-----+---------------------- | id | some other fields... +-----+---------------------- | 4 | | 65 | | 123 | +-----+---------------------- conn +-----+------+---+ | id | main | x | +-----+------+---+ | 1 | 4 | 0 | | 2 | 4 | 1 | | 3 | 123 | 0 | | 4 | 123 | 0 | +-----+------+---+ Query: SELECT m.* FROM main m LEFT OUTER JOIN conn c ON m.id = c.main GROUP BY m.id HAVING count(c.id) = 0; Result will be the line of 65. What i want is that that "count" only counts when x=1. In that case the result would be the lines of 65 and 123. Thank you in anticipation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
teng84 Posted September 15, 2007 Share Posted September 15, 2007 SELECT m.* FROM main m LEFT OUTER JOIN conn c ON m.id = c.main where c.x = 1 GROUP BY m.id or maybe SELECT m.id,count(c.id ) FROM main m LEFT OUTER JOIN conn c ON m.id = c.main where c.x = 1 GROUP BY m.id <-- should give you something like (65 numberfields) is that what you mean? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leafface Posted September 15, 2007 Author Share Posted September 15, 2007 SELECT m.id,count(c.id ) FROM main m LEFT OUTER JOIN conn c ON m.id = c.main where c.x = 1 GROUP BY m.id <-- should give you something like (65 numberfields) No, that's exactly the opposite of what i want. Because this will return: (id => 4, count => 1) The count() should avoid those rows while counting where c.x<>1, not the query. Actually i can go on by fetching the opposite of the needed result, and exclude the result set from the complete ID list with php. But that's pretty lame, isn't it? I'm sure it can be solved prettier, everything can be queried in sql, can't it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fenway Posted September 15, 2007 Share Posted September 15, 2007 You need to add c.x=1 to the ON clause. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leafface Posted September 15, 2007 Author Share Posted September 15, 2007 Oh joy, thank you very much! (Funny enough i remember trying to add it also to the on clause, well looks like i didn't. ) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.