fenway Posted October 24, 2007 Share Posted October 24, 2007 When would I need to do that? I'm honestly trying to look as far forward as possible here, but I really haven't found many downsides to using SET for this project.. It's possible that your project doesn't need it... but just because you don't see a need for something doesn't mean that it shouldn't be impossible to add later on. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
neoform Posted October 25, 2007 Author Share Posted October 25, 2007 Well, realistically, I'm looking for the most efficient way to do permissions with the least amount of downsides. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fenway Posted October 25, 2007 Share Posted October 25, 2007 Well, realistically, I'm looking for the most efficient way to do permissions with the least amount of downsides. Ultimately, SETs are bitmasks, which is just not worth the hassle. I wouldn't worry too much about have one extra permissions table; I promise it won't be the bottleneck in your app. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
neoform Posted October 25, 2007 Author Share Posted October 25, 2007 Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm... You're tempting me to go back.. But I'm not sure. I'll mull the idea for a bit before I revert.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.