Mahngiel

this is why classes exist, and why an element can have multiple classes

Neat. You're welcome.

I don't know what time you eat "dinner" or when you get off from work, but where I come from, dinner is at 6pm. If you mean the American version of "lunch", then I'm jealous you get to drink and return to lunch Very interesting concept to stand, I've never seen/heard of this. I abuse my desk chairs, so maybe I'd save some money by standing!

I wanted to reply yesterday, but i lost the link. https://chevereto.com/ http://demo.hevereto.com/ If you look hard enough, I'm sure you could avoid the licensing fee.

I skimmed your post and misread it initially and neglected to edit that out. Adding sent and read status options is just a matter of extending the database or modifying the query. In regards to `read status`, I generally like to use a boolean value (1=read, 0=unread) that the application will update. On that same note, you could apply the same concept to `visibility` if you want to keep all messages regardless if they've been marked 'deleted'. You have to approaches when it comes to grabbing the messages sent to and by a user. You could separate the queries depending on if the user is on his 'inbox' or 'sent box', which just applies the user's `user_id` to the different column. Or, you could grab both columns and sort them depending on where their id falls. Give it a try, and post any code you have problems with.

VLC will play from rar packs

have you done any debugging like checking your property values ensuring there's actual data there, or checking the logs to see if there are any errors?

what does an inbox/messaging system have to do with pagination? Just create simple table with row id, from_user_id, to_user_id, and message. Based on a user's ID, you query the table for messages to them. if there are more than the desired amount of returned messages, you'll need to set a query string which manages the limits in your query. you can read a tutorial on pagination here by PHPF's own .josh Not sure what you're really going for here.

are you talking about wanting line numbers in your shell for when you open documents?

If you're always going to add "in books" or whatever, why not just use .text( $(this) + 'in books' ) ? I sorta skimmed the posts, sorry if i missed an important detail why you couldn't do that.

You're quite incorrect there, and you've missed the entire purpose of my argument. There's a reason javascript frameworks are bloated with code specifically for IE. There's a reason the "shiv" market is expansive. There's a reason massively-scaled entities are dropping support for old versions. IE is the only browser that has this issue, why is that even debated? Cheers for IE bringing 9 and 10 (eventually) to the market place, what these are/will be are what the previous versions should have been. It's my opinion that the development community should foster and promote the growth of the web, instead of holding on to the old and out-dated. You want to talk about business sense? How about not dedicating resources to worry about defunct browsers. You may hold on to jQuery 1.99 with IE6 support, but I won't. I congratulate everybody who focuses on the future without hanging onto old baggage.

I am a creator of the web. Users come to MY sites to view MY product how I designed it. Use a fucking browser that works. And this right here demonstrates your failure to understand business 101. If 50% of your customers don't like mustard as the default ingredient on your burger, you don't tell them to suck it up, you take the fucking mustard off as the default condiment. Or you watch your customers and your paycheck walk out the door as they go to other places who cater to them. You serve the customer, not the other way around. Development / design are not hotdogs - there is no recipe. Users do not know what they want, nor how they want it, so your point is completely invalid. There's a billion-dollar business out there who's (departed) CEO's mission statement was Forbes

http://jqueryui.com/demos/sortable/

This is where you've had too much of the MS PR Kool-aid. My disdain for the browser has nothing to do with how hard it makes my job, it's about how shitty it makes the internet. From gaping security holes to "compatibility" mode, IE has always been a step behind in delivering Web 2.0. I am a creator of the web. Users come to MY sites to view MY product how I designed it. Use a fucking browser that works.

If you tell me you read the changelog to a kernel on your nix server, I'll buy it. But if you're trying to tell me/us that you proof every changelog for your FF, I call bullshit. A majority of updates are bugfixes and vulnerability updates, there's a reason they're pushed. They are also updates/upgrades to the browser engine which are vital to the living web. I get your point about you being the user, but 99.9% of the time, you, the user, don't have a fucking clue about what you need. I will only give you partial credit for this. Those who are still on the MS PR teet will do so, continuing to cater to a) communist china and b) ignorant masses. It is the responsibility of web creators to steer the web and leave behind old habits. With many corporations running enterprise solutions on their computers through intranets, it makes business sense NOT to update. Aside from those scenarios, it makes little sense why batch updates couldn't be pushed out. Holy hell, how long has IE8 and 9 been out? After how long, .josh? When are these updates released? IE10 is the closest MS has gotten to "standards" and it won't even be out until Win8! What about 7 users? XP?? The problem is that MS did not have the forethought to include the ability for updates to the browser without major releases or SPs. Had this been an option, I guarantee IE8 have would seen engine modifications to adapt to the newer specs.

Give Windows long enough and it'll require a reinstall. At which point IE8 isn't even downloadable from MS.com

filter:progid:DXImageTransform.Microsoft.AlphaImageLoader(src='path/to/img.png', sizingMethod='scale');

It is indeed MS's fault. Why would you NOT have silent updates? Corporate IT departments have their systems on lock-down, which doesn't even allow users to upgrade to newer versions of IE! At least if MS had silent updates they could be batched in. BTW, jQuery is dropping IE8 too. The mere option would be beneficial.

pretty code. you do that?

what do you want me/us to do? magically fix your code? PHP is already telling you the problem. post the code relevant to the issue.

got a back up?

Undefined property: stdClass::$task on line 64

Why? and for what authority do you say that? text-align:center; is much more semantic and appropriate

you missed the freelancer section

*Mahngiel likes nano. I've never felt the need to use a shell editor, seems too 1980s. Instead, I uses an SFTP capable editor (bluefish isn't the most feature-rich, but it works with remote files very fast). [/me] Hopefully you find a reasonable answer, though. edit: lol @ the [me][/me] tag