Daniel0

So, were your issues resolved?

Personally, if someone colors an entire post then I'll edit it. Had I not been able to do that then I wouldn't read the post at all.

What?

This should be blatantly obvious, so it's a wonder that people actually need to be told this.

That's weird. We're offloading the feed hosting to Feedburner. I'll try to contact them about it.

Instead of describing how you think you should do, how about describing what you want the result to be? Are you just looking to get a list of people and their opponents? This is essentially a many-to-many relationship for which you'll need an intermediary table to store relations. Sort of like this: SELECT a.player_name player1, b.player_name player2 FROM player_opponents x INNER JOIN players a ON x.player_id = a.player_id INNER JOIN players b ON x.player_id = b.player_id; The player_opponents table just has two integer fields referencing a row in the players table.

You need to actually read and send the file to the client. See this post: http://www.phpfreaks.com/forums/index.php/topic,95433.0.html

Welcome to PHP Freaks. Are you saying that you cannot see the menu items such as "Profile", "My Messages" etc. even when you are logged in? Your topic is here: http://www.phpfreaks.com/forums/index.php/topic,232064.0.html You can find all your topics/posts by going to your profile and click the "show posts" link. Moreover, you can see updates to any topics you've posted in by using the "show new replies to your topics" link on the top of every page. Finally, please do not color all your posts. It just makes it look annoying and you risk that people who would have otherwise read and answered your question might turn away.

Either it's a bug in SMF or Chrome then.

I cannot reproduce that using Chrome.

Uhm... you're posting it without newlines...

It works fine for me in Chrome.

Headers are split on a newline (\n).

Chrome is not beta.

Ah but the ToS does not specifically prohibit you from having an insecure LAN. It specifically says "... allow others to ...". I suppose that depends on how you interpret it. Leaving it open creates a kind of "ACL-allow" for people to use it in the "Can X do this? [Yes/No]" sense where the default is "Yes". I meant your own perception of your experience. If you consider yourself experienced then you should know. If not, then you should have RTFM because that's what its for - figuring out how your product works and how you are supposed to use it. Those two sentences contradict each other. If most people do not bother with manuals, then it would not be logical to assume one would read the manual. But nonetheless, making a statement like "most people do not bother with manuals" is speculation, and would be treated as such, in court. The only reason I point out the inconsistency is because you believe that most people don't bother, and yet say it's logical to assume that they would. I don't think it's contradictory. A manual is meant to be read if you do not already possess the knowledge it contains. You may for instance find that the manual of your microwave says that you shouldn't dry your pets in it. Apparently that is sufficient to protect the manufacturer from lawsuits. This sets a precedent for that it would be logical to assume that the end user would have read the accompanying manual of a product. It's your own choice if you choose not to read important information in the same way that we still punish people who broke our rules here even if they didn't bother to read them. If you genuinely didn't know, and there was nowhere in the product (or the things that follow the product (e.g. manual)) stated that not encrypting the signal would enable everybody within range to use it and that it could potentially create a security risk, then you would have a good case, but I think most manuals (or installation guides) say this. Checking this would be fairly easy in the case of a dispute. If the manual didn't mention this then it sucks.

How am I going to prove my innocence? Dunno how you guys do it over there, but over here, law is innocent until proven guilty. All I have to do is say I was ignorant. Burden of proof is on them. Yeah, we are innocent until proven guilty, the fact that you left it open even though the ToS explicitly prohibited it remains. Sure, you could claim ignorance, but I could also claim that I didn't know shooting you could kill you. It's just a matter of whether your ignorance is believable or not. If you were considered an experienced user then it would be difficult to believe you didn't know. If, however, you weren't then the aforementioned guide would tell you, and if not then at least it would be written somewhere in the manual. If you claim to be an inexperienced user of that type of equipment then it would be logical to assume that you would read the manual to figure out how to use your equipment properly. I know most people do not bother with manuals, but that isn't really an excuse in my opinion. Otherwise every single crime or contractual breach could be voided by ignorance. I'm quite sure your insurance company wouldn't cover your losses if someone stole your things if you forgot to lock your door. In Denmark they wouldn't, and here a locked door is what separates burglary from theft.

But I suppose that if they wanted to be asses then they could just terminate a such person's account. How are you going to prove that you were ignorant and didn't leave it open for public usage intentionally? Any wireless router I've ever used and/or setup has always presented me with a guide advising me to turn encryption on though, so I fail to see how some people don't do it unless they perhaps are buying enterprise grade routers where you expect a certain level of competency of the end users. I wouldn't imagine anything would happen. You wouldn't be charged with murder if I stole your gun and shot someone with it either. I suppose you're right though. Leaving my door unlocked (or even letting someone in) doesn't mean that everybody may steal my shit.

Does that mean that you are violating ToS if you are too stupid to encrypt your signal?

You mean like this? http://www.phpfreaks.com/tutorial/debugging-a-beginners-guide

Please do not post links to download copyrighted material that you do not have the right to redistribute yourself.

Why don't you ask your ISP? There is no way we can know as each ISP has its own policies. They may or may not require you to upgrade to a corporate account or something like that.

I'll sticky this for further reference and in case other people might know books that people might find useful.

I can't remember when I've last used FTP. I always use SSH, SCP and SVN.

I've read some of SitePoint's Simply JavaScript. At the time I read it I found it pretty good.

[quote author=lukkyjay link=topic=119433.msg728404#msg728404 date=1193718287] I'm just now starting to learn php for a project on my own site.  I don't understand how a WYSIWYG would work with php, but that would be awesome if it were actually possible.  Can you get specific about the best WYSIWYG for a beginner? [/quote] WYSIWYG is for HTML only. Best is a matter of personal preference and hence the reason why this and [url=http://www.phpfreaks.com/forums/index.php/topic,54859.0.html]this[/url] topic are created.