MadTechie

Infinite time, still means infinite possibilities.. with this ever grown list of possibilities theirs no way your when you have mine in that list.. so when could/would you stop.. surely you can only stop when you know you have the original which means you need all possibilities which is infinite.. thus not possible! This statement still remains true This hash is mathematically irreversible, meaning that it is impossible to determine the original password using only the hash. jxrd: indeed but that's nothing to do with cracking MD5, that's cracking a password that the salt makes stronger

I have a challenge that could get you up to $15,000 if you want to take the challenge or you could take the $5000 version any time. Your statement should be if you don't use salt your password it more likely to have a hash match in a rainbow table.

Again with the passwords.. Okay read the topic.. all of this has been covered.. Here the thing people are not getting. 1. Can you generate an input that matches the hash output, Yes 2. Can you reverse the has back to its original state, NO creaking MD5 would mean 2 was true BUT ITS IMPOSSIBLE! adding salt just adds extra protection for the limitation of the passwords entered (length, characters) PugJr: if you mean you can get the same contents then your wrong.. if you have a finger print, can you clone someone from it ? you maybe able to create someone with the same finger print but is the DNA the same.? You won't know unless you can compare to the original but you only have a finger print!

LOL, my number is 6 my mobile is 7 anyone a 5 ? But atleast possible. PugJr , please tell me your joking.. as that's quite a dumb statement to make! i have already told you

Okay well i don't see an error, if their was your notice it right at the top, thats PNG data so thats fine, put the header back and reload that page it should load fine

LOL it doesn't matter about the length, its not possible even using brute force we have covered all of this! Oh and sure $5000, How about this I'll offer $15,000 if you crack it in a week and if you don't you give me $5000 but you only have 24hour to accept

I ALWAYS recommend salt, but your statement isn't 100% true, if you read the thread your know that. This statement is true But if your up for a challenge I'll offer the same challenge as Daniel but without salt here is a Pure MD5 no salt I'll send you $50 over PayPal if you tell me what the what the plaintext value I used for this hash is: ec81f8fe815098e02460e0184d3eac4e It's not enough finding a string that matches the hash. You must prove that what you got is the same as what I originally had. Anyone else who wants to try can claim the $50 as well. Now remember Daniel had salt So this should be easy for you..

The fact you even ask that mean you haven't read the whole thread, so as I have said before, I don't repeat myself, If you really want to know then read the whole thread this has been covered ready. Simply put MD5 is a one-way hash function that expects a plaintext password and then outputs a hash, This hash is mathematically irreversible, meaning that it is impossible to determine the original password using only the hash. Daniel0 and I have tried to explain this in this thread...

!00% agree with that statement, (hence my post) Using my exact code in its own file should work fine, however as far as we know you could have a form in a form!

Remove the @ when testing for bugs! also comment out the header("Content-Type: image/png"); to see if theirs an error at the start of the page

Well I have move the post to the correct section now.. "Editor Help"

its probably an encoding issule, but now saying what your using really doesn't help! also this isn't a PHP question!

You can get the data from the user viewing it like the browser type etc but NOT the page its on, this is due to the simple fact that the page isn't using it, its give the path to the end user who's using it

You should declare it first You use the key EDIT: it maybe worth reading current() and count()

i can think of 3 options, create a C++ App and pass the file to it, or re-complie php with a C++ class wrapping a class into PHP itself, finally create a COM

Check list <?php phpinfo(); ?> [*]upload_max_filesize [*]memory_limit [*]max_execution_time [*]post_max_size [*]file_uploads

Yep what PFMaBiSmAd said, a trick i have used in before is to set $list[0]=""; at the start then when i get the details i set it again $list[0]=$leadrow, the first one makes sure its in the correct place, of course you could sort it

Nothing ? you should get the errors above the form.. try a small file!

or file_uploads is off (check phpinfo();) EDIT: oh and check postmaxsize Can you try my script also what OS and browser are you running this on ?

the code you posted does have problems but the results you say your getting don't match, hence giving you some other code to test with, however that seams to be failing so either something very strange is going on or I'm not getting the whole story! Here is a very basic version, if this failed it should at least let us know why! with some details <?php if(isset($_POST['submit'])) { echo "<pre>"; var_dump($_FILES["userfile"]); echo "</pre>"; if($_FILES["userfile"]["error"] == 0) { if(move_uploaded_file($_FILES["userfile"]["tmp_name"],$_FILES["userfile"]["name"]) or die("Problems with upload")) { echo "Upload: {$_FILES["userfile"]["name"]}"; }else{ echo "FAILED: {$_FILES["userfile"]["name"]}"; } }else{ echo "error: ".$_FILES["userfile"]["error"]; } } ?> <form action="" method="post" enctype="multipart/form-data"> <input name="userfile" type="file" /><br /> <input type="submit" name="submit" value="Send files" /> </form>

Happy to be your second pair of eyes

The only way I can re-create the error is by submitting without selecting for a file first, check your php.ini file and check file_uploads is on upload_tmp_dir and upload_max_filesize are set correctly

please read my last post! EDIT: infact let me be clear.. have you tried the code i posted in its own file with error reporting added ?

Coughs type=

So did you try the code above in its own file, ? also add the error reporting