
waynew
Members-
Posts
2,405 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by waynew
-
I was a little confused about what you're wanting to do, so I'm going to assume that others who read this topic were also a little confused about what you are trying to do. Please give us a clearer explanation about what you want to achieve.
-
<?php $ip = $_SERVER['REMOTE_ADDR']; ?> Is all you need.
-
Why? You provided no extra details than what I did, the argument was already laid out for others to see. The only reason I can see for you saying it is to prove that I was right about you using it as an argument. You should be careful about proving me right when your so determined to disagree with what I say... Considering if you read my very first post you'll see that my own personal reservations have a LOT more todo with the pentagon than the tradecenter I really don't see why you seem so persistent to 'argue' when I've not laid out any direct contradictions to your opinion. I've only attempted to prove that it's not as clear cut (from an engineering standpoint) as everybody seems to think. It is the blanket denials and simplification of evidence that leads to the conspiracy theories emergining in the first place. Yes - the facts were the same. I just summed it up in an easy ABC-like fashion. 50% loss of strength in steel + heavy impact of passenger jet into very large skyscraper = not hard to imagine why the WTC collapsed. And pray tell - what are they reservations that you hold about the attack on the Pentagon?
-
Yes - but we're not just talking about burning fuel are we? We're talking about burning fuel PLUS the initial impact of a large passenger jet into a very large skyscraper. Surely a support column would have been severed here and there? PS: I know you said I'd say that but it still had to be said.
-
The part about the film students is as true as truth can truthfully get.
-
Steel wouldn't melt under the heat produced by burning fuel. However, jet fuel burns at 825° C and steel loses 50% of it's strength at 648 ° C. Do the math on that one.
-
For a conspiracy of this scale, it would take alot more than just a few scheming men sitting around a table. We're talking about Emergency personnel etc.
-
Well Cags - my opening post was pretty aggressive because, to be honest, the majority of those declaring that some things "just don't add up", have said so on the basis that they believe the US government were behind the whole incident. It's a case of people being bored enough with their lives to believe in this crap. MANY engineers etc have given their opinions on matters relating to the events on 9/11, yet the majority of these conspiracy theorists still refuse to believe that it wasn't an inside job.
-
prove it Prove it? We don't need to. Two large jets flew straight into each of the buildings and they collapsed. Case closed. Unless you can prove otherwise.
-
Please, for the love of God, tell me that nobody on this forum believes in this conspiracy crap? I was just browsing Youtube when I came across a video based on 9/11, and the comment section was filled with retards stating "OMG IT DUZNT ADD UP".
-
Rupert Murdoch seems to have a problem with news being free. http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/technology/2009/12/did_google_just_blink.html
-
Shouldn't be hard to write yourself dude. Just give the comment table a parent_id column that relates to what comment he/she is replying to - or 0 for default.
-
I was just thinking. If you could somehow create an image (images can't be read easily by bots) that shows random characters. Then save those same characters in a session variable and ask the end user to input what he or she seen in the image?
-
JavaScript will always need to interact with a file that will handle server-side actions. This is most likely an Ajax poll. You'll need to read the source code and figure out what file this javascript is accessing, you big hacker, you.
-
This should be in the CSS section, not the PHP Help section.
-
Never.
-
Oh you! Seriously, I was too drunk to read the replies so I just posted it thinking "why not, surely the admins and mods won't get too annoyed if I post a solution that has already been brought up by somebody else".
-
You're probably looking for the HTML forum. Also, you shouldn't be asking for private help. That's not what the forums are about.
-
I actually put the picture there on purpose.
-
WTF? ROFL! LMAO!
-
ENJOY YOUR IMPERIALISM AMERIA
-
ENJOY YOUR IMPERIALISM AMERIKKA!
-
Just have a column in your comment table called is_approved. Set the default to 0, and only select comments where is_approved = 1. Then give admin access the ability to set comments as approved. You could use a captcha too.
-
Well firstly, you're going to have to figure out how the CMS manages passwords (hashing etc) and modify the forum software to work the same way.