Jump to content

GNU GPL v.3. opinion needed


Mchl

Recommended Posts

A situation:

- Alice (forgive me Alice, but using 'a person' seemed too lame) obtains a GNU GPLed code

- Alice modifies source code, compiles a binary

- Alice decides to give the copies of the binary to some of her friends, without intent to further distribute it

- Since all her friends know, that the original work GNU GPLed, and that they can ask Alice for modified source code if they wished to, Alice does not include a copy of GNU GPL with her binaries.

- Also, since the binary is not publicly available, Alice does not publish any changes to the source code, that she made.

 

Question:

Does this violate GNU GPL v3 in any way?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One more question: in case GNU GPL would be somehow violated, would it mean, that the user has no right to run this binary at all?

 

The license is only really for distributors. The license is meant to promote open source and therefore it forces people to release the source code along the binaries. If you violate the license then it's strictly speaking a contractual breach in which case you might find yourself in court.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is more than a year old. Please don't revive it unless you have something important to add.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.