bigmatt19 Posted August 12, 2006 Share Posted August 12, 2006 On the one hand I hope this is simple, but on the other I'd like to think of myself as being pretty good with this stuff ;)... so here's the issue... I am creating a threaded message forum from scratch. I have figured out a way to display the threads using a recursive algorithm... but it seems inefficient. The forum would be sorta like slashdot's in that the replies to each post will be nested...I have a two tables: messages and messagerelation. Messages contains:[b][u]messages[/u][/b][table][tr][td][b]messageID[/b][/td][td][b]parentID[/b][/td][td][b]etc.[/b][/td][/tr][tr][td]0[/td][td][i]NULL[/i][/td][td][i]NULL[/i][/td][/tr][tr][td]3[/td][td]1[/td][td]etc..[/td][/tr][tr][td]4[/td][td]2[/td][td]etc..[/td][/tr][tr][td]5[/td][td]2[/td][td]etc..[/td][/tr][tr][td]1[/td][td]0[/td][td]etc..[/td][/tr][tr][td]2[/td][td]1[/td][td]etc..[/td][/tr][tr][td]6[/td][td]3[/td][td]etc..[/td][/tr][/table]Then messagerelationships contains:[b][u]messagerelationships[/u][/b][table][tr][td][b]messageID[/b][/td][td][b]relatedto[/b][/td][/tr][tr][td]1[/td][td]0[/td][/tr][tr][td]2[/td][td]1[/td][/tr][tr][td]2[/td][td]0[/td][/tr][tr][td]3[/td][td]1[/td][/tr][tr][td]3[/td][td]0[/td][/tr][tr][td]4[/td][td]2[/td][/tr][tr][td]4[/td][td]1[/td][/tr][tr][td]4[/td][td]0[/td][/tr][tr][td]5[/td][td]2[/td][/tr][tr][td]5[/td][td]1[/td][/tr][tr][td]5[/td][td]0[/td][/tr][tr][td]6[/td][td]3[/td][/tr][tr][td]6[/td][td]1[/td][/tr][tr][td]6[/td][td]0[/td][/tr][/table]Ok.. so here is what I want to get when I perform a query to grab every message related to a messageID:[b][u]RESULT DESIRED[/u][/b][table][tr][td][b]messageID[/b][/td][td][b]parentID[/b][/td][td][b]etc.[/b][/td][/tr][tr][td]1[/td][td]0[/td][td]etc..[/td][/tr][tr][td]2[/td][td]1[/td][td]etc..[/td][/tr][tr][td]4[/td][td]2[/td][td]etc..[/td][/tr][tr][td]5[/td][td]2[/td][td]etc..[/td][/tr][tr][td]3[/td][td]1[/td][td]etc..[/td][/tr][tr][td]6[/td][td]3[/td][td]etc..[/td][/tr][/table]but what I get:[b][u]ACTUAL RESULT[/u][/b][table][tr][td][b]messageID[/b][/td][td][b]parentID[/b][/td][td][b]etc.[/b][/td][/tr][tr][td]1[/td][td]0[/td][td]etc..[/td][/tr][tr][td]2[/td][td]1[/td][td]etc..[/td][/tr][tr][td]3[/td][td]1[/td][td]etc..[/td][/tr][tr][td]4[/td][td]2[/td][td]etc..[/td][/tr][tr][td]5[/td][td]2[/td][td]etc..[/td][/tr][tr][td]6[/td][td]3[/td][td]etc..[/td][/tr][/table]The query I am using I knew wouldn't give me what I wanted, but I hoped it would be a good start to inspire me to write the correct query. Here it is:[code]SELECT * FROM messagesWHERE messageid IN (SELECT messageid FROM messagerelationships WHERE relatedto = 1) OR messageid = 1ORDER BY parent;[/code]Any help you can give would be a life-saver!TIA!Matt Link to comment https://forums.phpfreaks.com/topic/17337-complex-sort-for-forum-software/ Share on other sites More sharing options...
fenway Posted August 12, 2006 Share Posted August 12, 2006 I'm confused... how is the desired result supposed to be organzied? Link to comment https://forums.phpfreaks.com/topic/17337-complex-sort-for-forum-software/#findComment-73741 Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigmatt19 Posted August 12, 2006 Author Share Posted August 12, 2006 The desired result would allow me to produce something like this:[pre]Original Message (1) Reply to Original (2) Reply to 2 (4) Reply to 2 (5) Reply to Original (3) Reply to 3 (6)[/pre]And really to be able to nest as deep as I want... dynamically.Hope that clarifies things a bit.-Matt Link to comment https://forums.phpfreaks.com/topic/17337-complex-sort-for-forum-software/#findComment-73800 Share on other sites More sharing options...
alpine Posted August 13, 2006 Share Posted August 13, 2006 You would be easiest off with a Main-post ID in your table, all sub-posts would relate to the main id, then the parent id will sort further.That way cou can order them by one table. Link to comment https://forums.phpfreaks.com/topic/17337-complex-sort-for-forum-software/#findComment-73969 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.