king450d Posted September 25, 2010 Share Posted September 25, 2010 Our organization has just designed a new site layout Please give us some detailed comments & critique for improvements~! http://www.hkceces.org/e_parent.php3 thanks a lot! Link to comment https://forums.phpfreaks.com/topic/214338-detailed-site-critique-need-from-professional-designers-like-you/ Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colton.Wagner Posted September 27, 2010 Share Posted September 27, 2010 Compared to most of the sites I have seen and critiqued this one looks good. However there are a few to many slices in my opinion. When you export the slices you should look into fixing the loading time on them as well. It took close to 5 seconds to load your page and I have 10 up 2 down. Just a thought hope I could help. Thanks, Colton Wagner Link to comment https://forums.phpfreaks.com/topic/214338-detailed-site-critique-need-from-professional-designers-like-you/#findComment-1116366 Share on other sites More sharing options...
chmpdog Posted October 5, 2010 Share Posted October 5, 2010 image preloader. Link to comment https://forums.phpfreaks.com/topic/214338-detailed-site-critique-need-from-professional-designers-like-you/#findComment-1119155 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rakuhana Posted October 8, 2010 Share Posted October 8, 2010 The overall look is nice. I'd try to not use Imageready to generate a website. WYSIWYG tends to package alot of bs with your site (such as the image preloader). Your site is also not xhtml, uses tables for the layout (again, WYSIWYG = hot mess), and some pages have broken layouts: http://www.hkceces.org/e_news.php3 Link to comment https://forums.phpfreaks.com/topic/214338-detailed-site-critique-need-from-professional-designers-like-you/#findComment-1120075 Share on other sites More sharing options...
ignace Posted October 8, 2010 Share Posted October 8, 2010 @Rakuhana 1) An image preloader may not be ideal, it's still better then having your images load slowly one-by-one on the web-page. 2) XHTML??? IE never even has supported XHTML (try to load index.xhtml in IE, it won't even work) as it renders it just like HTML. Almost every website that uses "XHTML" has it's content-type set to "text/html" while this should be set to "application/xhtml+xml" for XHTML documents. Link to comment https://forums.phpfreaks.com/topic/214338-detailed-site-critique-need-from-professional-designers-like-you/#findComment-1120136 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.