Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I have been building a home page, and I have a script that fades images out for a slide show.

 

for testing purposes, I made two scripts, one uses jQueries fadeOut() function an another is a jQuery plugin I made without the use of fadeOut().

While testing, I opened chrome's "background pages" tool, and watched the site. Whenever jQuery's fadeOut() function was triggered, the cpu went up to about 50%. When I tested my plugin the cpu only went up to 32%.

 

jQuery's: ciaobellaphotography.us

My jQuery plugin: ciaobellaphotography.us/index2.php

 

Do you guys see any noticeable difference between the two or have any additional thoughts?

Link to comment
https://forums.phpfreaks.com/topic/266308-jquery-fadeout-too-much-cpu/
Share on other sites

ciaobellaphotography.us - memory is around ~78,000-83,000K, CPU peaks at about 24% briefly, Javascript memory is ~13,000K

 

ciaobellaphotography.us/index2.php - memory is around ~46,000-58,000K - CPU peaks at 18-20% briefly, Javascript memory is ~8,000K

 

So, it looks like index2.php performs a tiny bit better. As far as unresponsiveness or any visual lag, I don't notice any between the two on my machine.

This thread is more than a year old. Please don't revive it unless you have something important to add.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.