Leppy Posted August 10, 2007 Share Posted August 10, 2007 I've been trying to search on google and here but I haven't found anything on the subject. What I want to know is, which one of these is a better practice. 1. Having 1 row for hour so 24 rows per day 2. Having 1 row per day but 24 fields in the table Which one would be the best to go for, assuming my table will grow very large in the future. Thank you for any inputs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oldiesmann Posted August 10, 2007 Share Posted August 10, 2007 I don't think having 24 columns vs 24 rows would make much of a difference in terms of table size (you're still storing the same data). However, I would recommend doing one row per hour rather than one row per day. 24 columns would make things really confusing, and you'd need other columns besides one for each hour (one to uniquely identify each row, one to keep track of which day it was, etc.). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
teng84 Posted August 10, 2007 Share Posted August 10, 2007 we cant say which is better if your talking about normalization then look which has the most redundant data then answer your question Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fenway Posted August 20, 2007 Share Posted August 20, 2007 It depends what data you need later. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.