Daniel0

that is actually an excellent idea. You're not telling us you've been storing it on your clients' servers before you're done, right? Then it's bound to go wrong eventually...

I thought iPhones could render regular web pages?

From an SEO standpoint it doesn't matter as long as you are consistent. Semantically it does make most sense to use www because it implies that it's the webserver (as opposed to e.g. imap.example.com which would imply an IMAP server).

I think it looks nice, but you are relying way too much on Javascript for the site to work. Try to turn it off and then browse your site. You will find that it's impossible some places. I don't like how choosing projects from "Projects" makes a post request and cannot be linked to directly.

Maybe your GPU is not strong enough to handle the rendering of your videos in full screen?

Fixed.

It came up during a discussion of another issue in the staff forum, so I used mad design skills to make some badges for all the groups. Glad you like it.

I can guarantee you that the code hasn't been modified. Regardless, I'm glad you got your issue worked out though

I have something against smoking. Just because someone would like to get lung cancer doesn't mean I want to as well. Some morons in Denmark even created a bloody "Smokers Party" fighting to get their "right" to infest my lungs with their chemical garbage. If you check out the "English version" on that site then you'll see that they "will fight for mutual respect in the public space", which is quite obviously hypocritical. How are they respecting non-smokers by forcing them into passive smoking? Insofar people smoke outdoors, in a room specifically designed for smoking, or another place where other people aren't forced to breath toxic fumes then I have no problems with smoking. Alcohol and narcotics is different though. This will not have a direct effect on other people (except if you due to the intoxication of those substances harm other people).

Get them to sign a contract.

Don't buy viagra, wiener enlargement pills, or other types of pharmaceutics on the intertubes. Really though, how exactly did you get scammed?

samona, did you try? That's the easiest way of finding it out.

You'll have to donate more

That'll not happen. tags are also used for HTML, CSS, Javascript, regex, SQL, etc. here. You may use the [php] tag if you wish PHP syntax highlighting without using the PHP opening tag.

That's quite likely. The script at the end of that URL seems to be rootkit. That vulnerability is called RFI (Remote File Inclusion). Not without having access to the code. You may check out some of the tutorials we have here on PHP Freaks: http://www.phpfreaks.com/tutorial/php-security http://www.phpfreaks.com/tutorial/preventing-remote-file-include-attacks-with-mod-rewrite http://www.phpfreaks.com/tutorial/hardening-php-with-suhosin

Last I checked WebKit was better than Presto in terms of standards compliance. It was the first to pass Acid3.

The only compatibility issue I've had with x64 is that my calculator is not compatible.

The Miscellaneous board would probably be best. The only operating system specific board we have is the Linux board, and even though both Linux and Solaris are Unix-derivatives, I don't think Solaris fits there.

Heh... I wonder how CV's research is going. I remember giving him a dump of the posts and topics table so he could do research...

If it appears again, can you take a screenshot and send it to me?

ngreenwood6, please do not report posts that are not violating any rules. Thanks.

About 1 GB.

MySQL can do it itself. http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.0/en/slow-query-log.html

There is one at the top and one at the bottom. Then there is the youtube one that had to be displayed below all the posts because it sometimes caused loading issues, although that seems to have disappeared. From a visibility standpoint it makes a lot of sense to place the ads within the topics. Also, we use an SMF modification for displaying the ads, meaning we're restricted to the options it gives us. This makes it much easier to manage the ads without modifying the source ourselves each time.

Listen, whether there are ads or not is not debatable. Unless someone is willing to pay the amount of revenue we gain from the ads then they will stay. Period. We are well within our rights to hide the ads for whomever we wish. We get paid either by impression or by click (not sure which) so if we get less impressions or clicks by hiding the ads for certain users then we'll just not gain revenue from them (apart from their donation of course). They don't pay for ads that aren't shown so they have no say in that whatsoever. Oh really? What do you know about the costs of keeping this site up and what do you know about the revenue we get from displaying advertisements? I don't see how making our own advertising campaign will differ from using an existing one... What do you know about that? For your information, since we started displaying the ads we've earned $120 in donation subscription money. That doesn't make sense to me. What would be get spammed about and what would they beg for? They themselves can just go purchase a subscription and get ad-free pages, stars, and a colored name.