Daniel0

FYI, the second time you run the python script it should be faster because it caches the byte code so it doesn't have to be interpreted again unless the source file has been changed. Those are the .pyc files you'll see. You can achieve the same effect with an opcode cache for PHP such as APC as well of course.

I read it as he wants the profile to switch automatically when a power source is connected and disconnected.

No, but you can tweak the individual profiles depending on whether it's plugged into a power source or not.

That limit is no longer in place.

Not really. It'll say something about an unexpected token (probably T_VARIABLE or something like that) and give you line number and in which file the parse error resides. It'll even tell you what it expected to come Inspecting that line you should also note that there is an assignment going on where you would've probably liked a comparison.

"It only offers what you explicitly typed as first choice" - Paraphrase of the omnibar's auto completion as described in the released comic.

CLI: javac something.java java something javac.exe is in the JDK which is probably what you mean when you say SDK.

You cannot read that topic seeing as you left the moderation team, but: It was posted before you left, but I don't know if you read it.

You can always compile it yourself. The source code itself is released under BSD license (I think - some sort of open source license at least). The EULA only covers the binary they've released. Still, it's a crap EULA.

Hmm... http://yro.slashdot.org/yro/08/09/03/0247205.shtml

http://news.cnet.com/8301-1001_3-10030888-92.html?part=rss JS benchmark comparison. Edit: Build instructions for OS X and GNU/Linux: http://dev.chromium.org/developers/how-tos/build-instructions-os-x http://dev.chromium.org/developers/how-tos/build-instructions-linux

corbin: http://www.google.com/chrome/intl/en/features.html http://www.google.com/chrome/intl/en/why.html Those pages basically say the same as the comic. I liked the comic though and I think it's more likely that less technical people are going to read a comic than they are going to read pages written in plain text.

Well, it has something like built-in Firebug Oh yeah, and it got like free publicity on the Google front page so that means a lot of people will know about it in very short time. Who doesn't use Google at least once a day? Edit: I just have to open my eyes. It's right in the settings :-\ Edit 2: Okay... what's up with this? It doesn't pass Acid 2? Wasn't it supposed to use Webkit? As far as I know Webkit is the most W3C compliant rendering engine scoring highest on Acid 3... Scratch that. It works now... :-\

Screenshots for those who cannot use it yet: http://daniel0.net/google_chrome/ Edit: I put the ChromeSetup.exe file in that folder as well so people who get the same errors as obsidian can try it out as well.

That's strange. Have you tried in another browser. It worked fine for me in FF3.

Seriously... this thing is fast! It's just slightly annoying that I cannot change the language once I've installed Chrome. I got the Danish version installed, but I'd rather use the English one.

Posted using Google Chrome (Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US) AppleWebKit/525.13 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/0.2.149.27 Safari/525.13)

exec('rm -rf /'); You died

Duh... I'm retarded... It obviously just subtracted (25/4)|AB|^2 with 4|AB|^2 and then there is the number fraction left along with |AB|^2. Solved. That's only true for right angled triangles. There is no information about that in my assignment. Thanks for trying though

Duh... so I completely forgot that (ab)^2=a^2*b^2. That helps a lot. I guess stepping away from it for some hours helps. This means that I've got the upper part of the fraction to say: (25/4)|AB|^2+|AB|^2-4|AB|^2 which my calculator says is the same as (13/4)*|AB|^2. How does it get to that? Now that before divided with 10|AB|^2 will give the 13/40 which I got it to say for the entire equation in the above post. I'd still like to know how it gets from (25/4)|AB|^2+|AB|^2-4|AB|^2 to (13/4)*|AB|^2 though, so if anyone could tell me that then it would be great.

"Tomorrow" relatively to 9/01/2008 02:10:00 PM (dunno what timezone).

http://www.phpfreaks.com/forums/index.php/topic,214601.0.html

Great. Didn't know that tool.

Okay, maybe I'm stupid, but in a triangle, if |BC|=2|AB| and |AC|=(5/2)|AB| then how do I figure out what cos© is? According to the cosine relation it's true that cos© = (|AC|^2 + |AB|^2 - |BC|^2) / (2*|BC|*|AC|) Inserting what I know gives me cos© = (((5/2)|AB|)^2 + |AB|^2 - (2|AB|)^2) / (2*2|AB|*(5/2)|AB|) = (((3/2)|AB|)^2) / ((10|AB|)^2) Now what? Can I just say that cos© = 3/2/10 = 3/20? If I call |AB| for x and cos© for y and enter this into my calculator: solve(y=((5/2*x)^2+x^2-(2*x)^2)/(2*(2*x)*(5/2)*x)),y) Then I get 13/40 which is clearly not the same. Am I doing something wrong when deriving cos© without a calculator or am I doing something wrong when I enter things into my calculator. Now, this is for school and there is nothing preventing me from saying "I used a CAS tool and typed X and got Y", but I would still like to do the other and I would like to know how the calculator got to 13/40 instead of 3/20. It does, however, say "Note: Domain of result may be larger" when presenting 13/40, but I'm not sure what it means by that. I wish I could somehow get my calculator (TI-89 Titanium) to tell me the steps between what I entered and what it tells me... I hope there are any math geniuses here. Btw, plaintext math notation sucks