Daniel0

Then you've answered your own question, haven't you? What is that box' function and is it even necessary to route everything through it?

Why don't you just try?

Sorry, plenty of topics already exist on this subject here. Locked.

You said you modified the ACL for the file so it's probably you who've messed it up. The entries in the ACL for my hosts file are those that were by default.

It's exactly the same as GNU/Linux: daniel@degeberg:~$ echo 'hi' >> /etc/hosts -sh: /etc/hosts: Permission denied daniel@degeberg:~$ sudo -i [root@degeberg ~]# echo 'hi' >> /etc/hosts [root@degeberg ~]# In Vista's GUI using Notepad this corresponds to: 1) Open Notepad normally. Browse to and open C:\Windows\System32\drivers\etc\hosts 2) Edit something 3) Save This will give you this error: Then do this: 1) Right click on the Notepad icon 2) Select "Run as administrator" 3) Browse to and open C:\Windows\System32\drivers\etc\hosts 4) Edit something 5) Save Then it will save successfully. Quod erat demonstrandum.

To me it just sounds like the user is used to run Windows XP as an admin. Then when you use Vista you can't just edit files directly because you have to run a program with elevated permissions in order to edit system files. Therefore it gives that error. Kind of like trying to edit /etc/hosts on GNU/Linux without being root. It's just the user that's used to bad habits. When you installed Apache you did it in admin mode so that means the ACL hasn't got entries for your user which means you cannot edit httpd.conf in an unprivileged way. Likewise is it the same for the hosts file which Mchl mentioned above. It's neither silly nor undocumented and it's definitely not a bug. It's just different from XP.

You could do a phone interview. I know people who've worked remotely and haven't ever met their boss.

"Bla bla Vista sucks" *later* "Ooops, it was just me who screwed up"

I don't think the bots use the alexa toolbar Seriously, that Alexa ranking is bullshit. It only counts the people who are using the Alexa toolbar and those users are hardly representative of the entire internet userbase.

That might be the reason. They might not both have gotten as many good peers. Try a bandwidth test like http://speedtest.net

The diagonal stripes in the content areas are distracting when reading. If you want them then I suggest you put them in the background instead.

Well it would make sense that it would be like that. I guess they made some sort of optimizations to deal with that.

Regarding the single/double quote thing. http://phpbench.com indicates that there is no difference.

There are loads of online live courses you can attend. http://www.zend.com/en/services/training/ http://phparch.com/c/phpa/training

Again, I would suggest you to read what you post: (my emphasis) Furthermore, if you dump that snippet into the validator then you will see that it's regarded as an invalid attribute.

What are you talking about? What function? There is no function in that snippet. It's an invalid HTML attribute and it has nothing to do with Javascript whatsoever. The scanner sucks because it suggests people to use invalid markup. Furthermore, how is it immature to say that something sucks based on facts?

No it isn't. It's HTML syntax, not Javascript syntax.

Your scanner sucks. The autocomplete attribute does not exist in the specification or DTD. http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/interact/forms.html#h-17.4

darkfreaks, do you care to read what you are actually posting? "File inputs accepted"... duh... it's a file uploading script. Obviously you are able to upload files then...

Image uploaded successfully. Warning: imagecreatefromjpeg() [function.imagecreatefromjpeg]: gd-jpeg: JPEG library reports unrecoverable error: in /mounted-storage/home48c/sub007/sc33591-LWQU/link_check/up.php on line 67 Warning: imagecreatefromjpeg() [function.imagecreatefromjpeg]: 'user_img/f1b77376e6da9ea8126410f9331886e8-Guest.jpeg' is not a valid JPEG file in /mounted-storage/home48c/sub007/sc33591-LWQU/link_check/up.php on line 67 Warning: imagesx(): supplied argument is not a valid Image resource in /mounted-storage/home48c/sub007/sc33591-LWQU/link_check/up.php on line 68 Warning: imagesy(): supplied argument is not a valid Image resource in /mounted-storage/home48c/sub007/sc33591-LWQU/link_check/up.php on line 69 Warning: Division by zero in /mounted-storage/home48c/sub007/sc33591-LWQU/link_check/up.php on line 75 Warning: imagecreate() [function.imagecreate]: Invalid image dimensions in /mounted-storage/home48c/sub007/sc33591-LWQU/link_check/up.php on line 79 Warning: imagetruecolortopalette(): supplied argument is not a valid Image resource in /mounted-storage/home48c/sub007/sc33591-LWQU/link_check/up.php on line 80 Warning: imagecolorstotal(): supplied argument is not a valid Image resource in /mounted-storage/home48c/sub007/sc33591-LWQU/link_check/up.php on line 81 Warning: imagecopyresized(): supplied argument is not a valid Image resource in /mounted-storage/home48c/sub007/sc33591-LWQU/link_check/up.php on line 86 Warning: imagejpeg(): supplied argument is not a valid Image resource in /mounted-storage/home48c/sub007/sc33591-LWQU/link_check/up.php on line 87 Warning: imagedestroy(): supplied argument is not a valid Image resource in /mounted-storage/home48c/sub007/sc33591-LWQU/link_check/up.php on line 88 Warning: imagedestroy(): supplied argument is not a valid Image resource in /mounted-storage/home48c/sub007/sc33591-LWQU/link_check/up.php on line 89 Image shirnking successfully done.Guest.jpeg Also, it says "wrong file type" for .jpg

Looks fine to me.

How about just saying M*X*1.25?

That's why you should use ISO standards. International Organization for Standardization...

ISO 8601

Then why not just "preload" the image you are going to actually use instead? You cannot start loading something before the user requests it anyways.