Daniel0

Hmm... if this is true, then there is no such thing as "innovation" either.

Hehe... it's like the chicken and the egg.

Their CA isn't in most of the browsers and therefore the user will be presented with the same warning as with a self-signed certificate.

You need PHP 5.2.0 or later. Upgrade to the latest version.

Why not just run the query on that page instead of going to a new one?

Wordpress seems to be a popular choice.

I don't understand the problem. You haven't explained a problem but rather what [0-9] and [a-z] mean.

As neylitalo said, it is just as safe. The encryption doesn't change. It's just it is not issued by a trusted issuer and therefore it were not possible to verify who you are. It is therein it is not safe - e.g. to enter credit card information to a random person on the internet except somebody whose identity has been confirmed by a trusted company (e.g. VeriSign).

cool how do you know that bro.. Because I'm omniscient Well, Wikipedia has a list of common phrases.

I have had a such ISP, and it sucked.

If I remember correctly he speaks Tagalog. Magandáng umaga

http://username:[email protected]/path/to/file.gif

SitePoint has opened a closed beta of their CSS reference. It's open for anyone who joined before Dec 1, 2007. Just thought people might be interested in knowing it. It also includes compatibility sections of each attribute for IE, FF, Safari and Opera which is, in my opinion, awesome. http://reference.sitepoint.com/css

I scoured through that topic/blog post/whatever and I can't find any information on how to get it working for Firefox. Exactly, and that's because Windows Live Messenger doesn't configure Firefox to associate itself with that protocol - at least not as far as I know. If you install something like Pidgin then it will. Likewise will XChat associate itself with the irc protocol. [attachment deleted by admin]

Yeah, you're correct. My snippet showed the opposite in fact.

I just suppose they are. You could test it with this: <?php function test($var) { $var = 'hello'; } $connection = mysql_connect('localhost', 'root', ''); test($connection); echo ($connection == 'hello' ? 'not ' : null).'passed by reference'; ?> Even if it isn't passed by reference, it doesn't matter. It'll still work.

That might be the result of not speaking English natively. If you speak any other language than English, do you speak that perfectly? There is a difference between misspelling words on purpose and misspelling them because you are not fluent in the language. Still though, if somebody makes an otherwise grammatically correct post then I'd probably expect them to be able to distinguish between the words you mentioned as well.

No, but resources are passed by reference as well.

Only if it is an object as well. If it's just a regular string or int then it won't be passed as a reference.

If you are using PHP5, and since you use the private keyword you must be, you don't have to do so. In fact the call-time pass-by-reference is deprecated in PHP5. See: http://php.net/language.references.pass

How about $is_found = false; foreach($this->modules as $module) { if($module['name'] == $dep) { $is_found = true; break; } } if(!$is_found) die("Dependent file not present"); ?

I use PHP 5 as well. I don't see any reason to use PHP 4 when there is a newer and better version. Besides, PHP 4 will only be maintained until the end of this year.

I agree with SA and Ron. It also annoys me when people abbreviate "you" to "u", "your" to "ur" etc.

You log people in and out of the computers? o_O

http://xkcd.com/37/