Daniel0

http://digg.com/gaming_news/Survey_concludes_female_gamers_get_more_sex - heh...

Seeing as he is from UK, he must mean the kind of football that Americans call soccer.

Hehe, I've seen them all before, but they are still funny

I suppose you're able to make a competition/challenge here on this board, but alternatively you could add it as a contest idea for PHP Freaks' coming contents here: http://www.phpfreaks.com/forums/index.php/topic,123906.0.html Currently there is another contest running which is due at March 1st, so it wouldn't be before that one has ended.

http://www.google.com/search?q=seo

I think he would put that in "Terms & Conditions".

Not really. Giving a snippet would be like giving it a category or subject, then the tag cloud shows which categories/subjects that are most popular by giving them larger sizes than the less popular (bigger = more popular). The list of popular snippets just shows which specific snippets that are most popular. See: http://devzone.zend.com/public/view and http://devzone.zend.com/public/tagcloud

All content on websites is downloaded to the user's computer, so you can do all sorts of "protection", but it won't help at all.

Seeing as you're an HTML expert (according to your signature) you really should have heard about XHTML. While HTML is short for HyperText Markup Language, XHTML is short for Extensible HyperText Markup Language. XHTML is meant to supersede HTML and uses a XML structure (really ultra short description). More information here.

$array = str_split($binary_number);

It depends what you need to rate. If it is like a comment (see: Digg) I think a thumb up/down rating system works fine as it would seem sort of strange to me that a comment got "3.7 out of 5", but rather if it is really "dugg up" or "dugg down" is easier. For content sort of things (articles, tutorials, scripts, downloads, pictures etc.) I think a five points based rating system would be better.

There is a difference between the beta test board and the website review board. If you just want critique for your site it belongs in the review board. I just noticed one thing: "Time elapsed: 0.042178869247437 seconds - Queries (9)" - the end-user does not care about it, and s/he probably doesn't know what it means anyways. For the navigation: I was expecting them to be buttons instead of links, but I had to move my cursor "all the way" to the actual text instead of being able to click the button.

You also need to make sure that the mysql extension is actually loaded. In PHP5 it isn't by default. I'm not sure about PHP4. Check your php.ini to see if extension=php_mysql.dll (Windows) or extension=php_mysql.so (Linux - not sure if it has the php_ prefix) is present (without a semi-colon in the front).

Well... I've heard a lot of people defining the internet as typing "www."+something in the address bar in Internet Explorer... What many people think isn't necessarily correct.

Right... AJAX may be a significant thing in "Web 2.0", but it doesn't mean it is the same. A motherboard is important in computers, but a motherboard isn't a computer. I think you missed the word "optionally" in front of "Ajax-based" as well as the nine other points.

[quote author=ananda link=topic=121853.msg527341#msg527341 date=1171304649] Hi, I think there is a way to do it. Just get the time of entering the new data and keep it in session. When user tries to edit it....compare the current time with the session.....when the time diff is more than 2 minutes allow the user to edit....else just echo the user that the data is not ready and redirect the user back to the original page. hope it works. [/quote] Uhm... isn't that how it's done already? :-\

No it isn't. And because you think so it doesn't make it right. If I define PHP as a person wearing a green t-shirt and pink jeans living on the second floor in an apartment with five floors and who has has six couches and a laptop with a 60" monitor, then it doesn't mean that PHP is that. What you define as Web 2.0 is the use of XmlHttpRequest in JavaScript - and if you want a buzz word for that as well, then it is "AJAX". Info about "Web 2.0"

Man. Seriously. Stop posting all your questions in the misc. forum!! Post them in the appropriate forum. mod_rewrite goes into Apache. Cron goes into Linux. etc

Without a server? Then it is without a computer. How would you make a computer run a task without a computer?! Again Google would have helped you a lot. I assume it is alright to link to that site now as moderators have added it to their signature. If not, then click here instead.

I believe the recommended server is just the closest one to your IP. The closest one to me (Copenhagen) is 575/200 kbps

Yeah probably, but in my case it is probably my connection setting the limit as it is not particularly fast (512 kbps). With faster connections such as 20 mbps the server might do that.

If you are already learning PHP, then why not just stick with it instead of having to learn Ruby? Also, you cannot compare PHP with RoR. PHP is a language, RoR is a framework.

Try to test your speed at http://www.speedtest.net Downloads works fine for me in Firefox as long as my internet connection works and the remote server works. Also I don't think download accelerators accelerate much as I am already downloading at the speed set by my internet connection. I won't be able to exceed that without upgrading it.

So short/clean URLs. I love them Example: http://snippets.tzfiles.com/view/2

It reminds me of a myspace profiles...