Daniel0

So posting about things that earn you money isn't spamming?

[ot]Sorry guys. I'll have to see if I can get that bookmark mod ported to RC2.[/ot]

If you have a spare computer, you can just plug in the HDD on that one, install your Linux distro and then move the HDD back.

What also bothers me is that some people think they can do stuff here that they wouldn't otherwise get away with just because it's on the Internet. Examples: "Urgent!! Help me now. NEED HELP ASAP" - When waiting in the line in the supermarket, would you start shouting and demand that you should move up front in the queue? "I'm special, so I don't have to follow the rules" OR "I don't bother reading the rules, so I don't have to follow them." - Did you read your country's laws. Do you expect to be exempt because you didn't? "If you don't do as I say I'll sue you/kill you/DDoS you/hack you/etc." - No you're not, now GTFO. The extremity of the "I'll X you" seems to be inversely proportional to the age of the threathening member as well. "I'll leave this forum if I don't get it my way." - For most people, this threat is entirely without value. He is not paying us any money, and he is probably not contributing to (but only taking from) community, so we lose nothing. We lose something by having people who think they can do whatever they want. This effectively makes it a win if said person leaves. "The staff is abusing their powers when they moderate my clearly rule violating behavior." The list goes on and on. If you want the rules changed because you think they're unreasonable, make a topic in this board with proper arguments (not just that you think they suck). If you really think that a moderator's action was unfair, the rules page clearly states how you should appeal it. Starting to attack staff members is unlikely to gain you any sympathy and getting the actions reverted.

Just thought of something. You could have a field in the database that says whether or not the post has been manually verified by an admin. Then you can just check the unverified posts regularly.

Perhaps if he had chosen a more diplomatic instead of offensive route he would have received nicer responses. Compare it to saying "I think you suck and is an idiot" to your boss versus "I think X and Y are wrong, could we work on resolving it?" I bet your boss would tell you that you can just leave if you chose the former, or maybe even just plain fire you for insubordination.

Actually, it'll just be moved to PECL as far as I know. Maybe things have changed though.

The edit button "disappears" after 10 minutes because we've had problems with people replacing their original post with something like "solved". This ruins the search feature and makes it impossible for people to suggest alternate (better) solutions if they aren't fast enough. After that time frame has passed you can add additional information in a reply to the topic. Other problems were people addressing issues by going back editing posts instead of replying. This makes the topic really difficult to read. I stand by what I said though: If he does not accept our terms of service, he is not allowed to use this website. That is non-debatable. He agreed to the ToS when he registered. Whether or not he actually read it is irrelevant. The repercussions for breaking it is the same regardless. He even said he didn't care about our rules. In that case he is required to leave unless he changes his mind. It's not even a suggestion.

The session must have a name, by default it's PHPSESSID. You can pass the session ID to PHP in two ways: 1) Using a cookie with that name. 2) Using a parameter in the URL with that name, e.g. index.php?PHPSESSID=987sd9fshfblablabla You can turn off #2, which I would recommend.

No, but then again, neither will sessions unless you use that ugly PHPSESSID thing.

Uh... what's the problem with session_set_cookie_params(600); ? Cookies already have expiration, so just use that.

Just make the lifetime 10 minutes (well, 600 seconds) using session_set_cookie_params.

What is? I can't see the pattern. It's called lexicographical order.

Maybe CV modified the word filters, tricked him into posting it and then removed it again. I can't remember if mods can do that.

Double post. Locked.

So the staff sucks because they react on rule violations? Right... The rules are not there for you to see if you bother following them today. They're there because you are required to follow them. If you cannot accept that you weren't allowed to use this website in the first place. And you're tired of staff deleting your topics? I just looked over your entire post history. You've only ever had one topic deleted unless you have multiple accounts (which is also a rule violation). While looking over your history, I also noticed this in one of your topics: I read this as "I don't give a shit about your rules. I'll just do whatever I want." Basically, the problem seems to be with you and not our staff. I don't mind if you leave. I'd rather only have members who don't think they're the center of the world and can do whatever they want. "I was speeding and this cop gave me a ticket. The police totally sucks."

You cannot tell the difference between and or and ?

http://php.net/foreach

You didn't say that. You just said you wanted a string.

<?php $array = glob('something'); $str = ''; for ($i = 0; $l = sizeof($array); $i < $l; ++$i) { $a = str_rot13($array[$i]) . strrev($array[$i*3%$l]); $b = ''; for ($j = 0, $c = strlen($a); $j < $c; ++$j) { $b .= $j % 2 ? $a[$j] : ''; } $str .= $b; } echo $str;

Are you really expecting people to read all that? Use a profiler.

min

How fortunate that we do have an exclusive custom set of smilies then

So can computability theory. We don't have a board for that either.

I thought Google spell checked your searches. http://www.google.com/search?q=teest "Did you mean: test"