Jump to content

Recommended Posts

here is a rough idea of how to add a gif to something

 

.signup .button{
width: 70px; 
height: 21px;
color: #333;
background: #CCC url(../pix/headerbg.gif) repeat-x;
border: 0px solid #b0bec7;	
margin: 5px 0px 0px 25px;
}

 

 

this makes a gif 1px wide spead accross a button element you can use it with td elements too if you used repeat-y you could use a long gif to come down the element. or just to use one static gif no-repeat left top;

 

 

 

hope this helps

 

Link to comment
https://forums.phpfreaks.com/topic/146226-total-site-in-css/#findComment-767738
Share on other sites

Essentially the answer is yes.  It should be possible to do the entire design for your website in CSS, as long as you structure the HTML correctly.  Make good use of <div> and <span> and remember to include things like <a> in your style properties.

Link to comment
https://forums.phpfreaks.com/topic/146226-total-site-in-css/#findComment-767809
Share on other sites

yes it is the best way to do it I think make one main.css template then for then seperate ones for the content center parts that way it is easy to edit and track. I usually make a different center template for each page as having one long css form for an entire site is a nightmare to track

Link to comment
https://forums.phpfreaks.com/topic/146226-total-site-in-css/#findComment-767812
Share on other sites

Essentially the answer is yes.  It should be possible to do the entire design for your website in CSS, as long as you structure the HTML correctly.  Make good use of <div> and <span> and remember to include things like <a> in your style properties.

 

Actually, you shouldn't be using <span> unless its an extremely rare situation. Divs are almost always necessary, but don't forgot you can style certain elements directly.

 

To create a website in css 100% you need to be competent with <ul> <li>, floating/clearing, <p>, and using margins.

Link to comment
https://forums.phpfreaks.com/topic/146226-total-site-in-css/#findComment-767911
Share on other sites

yep tables can be a pain with positioning especially when you have a table in a table in a table thats why i said to make a main page template then seperate css sheets for the central contents then they are easier to go back and edit as long as you name the css the same as the page name you are editing.

I do it so i have a content holder in the main css template then  for example if i have  a news.php I make a seperate news.css for the news content a seperate one for form content etc.

Link to comment
https://forums.phpfreaks.com/topic/146226-total-site-in-css/#findComment-768156
Share on other sites

Yeah, I suppose, but I normally debug with my webdeveloper firefox addon.

 

It's amazing, I literally couldn't live without it.

 

You can outline any css elements on mouseover, or by custom, it usually shows me where I'm going wrong.

 

It also offers table/cell outlining.

 

If anyone reading this designs websites and hasn't got it, get it now- it's awesome.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/60

 

Yeah, I still use tables for some stuff, such as my forum. On the subject/topic view page, I've got around eight columns, and a table would be much more efficient. Generally speaking though, CSS is way better  O0

Link to comment
https://forums.phpfreaks.com/topic/146226-total-site-in-css/#findComment-768177
Share on other sites

I think what you probably mean to say is you're having trouble with IE displaying CSS differently? :P

 

lol

 

IE is a nightmare with CSS, that's the only bad thing about it.

 

Apart from that, it's great.

 

How exactly does IE7 interpret css incorrectly? I am still yet to find an issue with the IE's rendering engine. All errors that I have debugged thus far, have been caused by poor css styling and non-semantic html coding. I am sure IE8 is just as standard compliant as FF 3.1, if not better.

Link to comment
https://forums.phpfreaks.com/topic/146226-total-site-in-css/#findComment-768200
Share on other sites

IE 8 beta 2 is actually quite good, I must say.

 

It interprets stuff much more similiarly to FF, which is cool.

 

And pardon me if I'm a bit anti-IE, but I find it such a pain in the arse.

 

Once I've finished making a page, I think "Cool, glad that's done."

Then I have a look at it in internet explorer, and spend another several hourse getting it to look the same with conditional IE statements.

 

I think the reason they made the IE conditional statements is because they know their browser sucks and it needs a load of extra CSS to make stuff look the same as it does in every other browser...

Link to comment
https://forums.phpfreaks.com/topic/146226-total-site-in-css/#findComment-768225
Share on other sites

IE7 deals with floats and margins differently from every other browser at times. Look at this code for example:

 

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<title>Untitled Document</title>
</head>

<body>

<div style="float:left; width:120px; height:100px; right-margin:-120px; background-color:red;"></div>
<div style="padding-left:121px; height:100px; background-color:green;">
<div style="height:100px; width:100px; background-color:pink;"></div>
</div>

</body>
</html>

 

The pink div in both standards-compliant browsers as well as IE site is properly placed up to the edge of the 100px padding of its parent div (the green div). Since the red div is floated left and has a negative margin equal to its width, it should be taken out of the flow of the document entirely, meaning that the div below it (the green div) will sit behind the red div. Standards compliant browsers render this correctly, as can be seen in firefox. Since the green div has a 121px left padding, the red div sits over top of that, and anything contained in the green div will not go behind the red div. Where the problem lies is that IE starts the green div next to the red div, instead of behind it. No other major browser does that.

 

I know that IE7 also has its own rules with z-indexes, but since I never use them, I don't know the specifics. I've read about it in the past though.

 

 

Link to comment
https://forums.phpfreaks.com/topic/146226-total-site-in-css/#findComment-768894
Share on other sites

Negative margins should never be used. You can easily achieve the same effect using absolute positioning.

 

The example is rather extreme. I can give you one too - IE7 doesn't support display: table;... but that doesn't mean it isn't standard compliant. IE7 is the best browser to measure your competence as a web designer of semantic and proper code. If you need to use negative margins or crazy "hacks" for IE7, you haven't done your homework.

 

I am yet to see a flaw in IE7's rendering engine. Haku's example emphasizes IE7's incorrect visualization of negative margins - Negative margins are discouraged by the W3C, and for a good reason. Negative margins are illogical and the same effect can be achieved by more semantically correct coding techniques. It seems as though novices label IE7 as crap, when in reality, these people code garbage.

Link to comment
https://forums.phpfreaks.com/topic/146226-total-site-in-css/#findComment-768909
Share on other sites

Negative margins should never be used. You can easily achieve the same effect using absolute positioning.

 

The only reason negative margins shouldn't be used is because IE7 doesn't render them properly, as its a non-standards compliant browser. This is the case in point. Standards compliant browsers have no problems with this. And if there is nothing wrong with it, then why has IE fixed the problem in version 8 of its browser?

 

I can give you one too - IE7 doesn't support display: table;

 

Exactly. And that is one of the standards. And since IE doesn't support it, its not standards compliant. And again, since they have fixed this for IE8, they obviously accepted that it was non-compliant themselves.

 

but that doesn't mean it isn't standard compliant

 

Actually, yes it does.

 

IE7 is the best browser to measure your competence as a web designer of semantic and proper code.

 

If it was standards compliant, it would be. But as it's not, FF, Safari or other browsers are a better bet. Better to learn on a browser that is compliant, than one that isn't. Especially since even IE seems to be heading towards compliance with their new brower. Learning on IE7 is just starting off learning the wrong way.

 

If you need to use negative margins or crazy "hacks" for IE7, you haven't done your homework.

 

If IE7 was standards compliant, we wouldn't need to use conditional comments for it. And there is absolutely nothing wrong with negative margins - if there were, they wouldn't exist.

 

I am yet to see a flaw in IE7's rendering engine.

 

I pointed out one, and you pointed out another.

 

Negative margins are discouraged by the W3C

 

Really? Where?

 

It seems as though novices label IE7 as crap, when in reality, these people code garbage.

 

It's often a combination of both. IE7 is screwed up in its own way, but many people are posting garbage.

Link to comment
https://forums.phpfreaks.com/topic/146226-total-site-in-css/#findComment-768925
Share on other sites

IE7 deals with floats and margins differently from every other browser at times.

 

Yeah, I've noticed this.

 

For example, my titles for each page are something like this:

 

.title
{
top: 0;
width: 100%;
text-align: center;
position: absolute;
}

 

But because IE7 starts the div from where my body is, the title is way off to the right. Every other browser, including IE8 displays this correctly.

 

To fix this I had to use the following:

 

	<!--[if lt IE 8]>
		<style type="text/css">
			.title
			{
				position: relative;
				top: -40px;
				margin-bottom: -25px;
			}
		</style>
	<![endif]-->

Link to comment
https://forums.phpfreaks.com/topic/146226-total-site-in-css/#findComment-769022
Share on other sites

This thread is more than a year old. Please don't revive it unless you have something important to add.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.