spikeon Posted March 12, 2008 Share Posted March 12, 2008 For me and my Coder Krew tell me if this looks ok http://www.spikeoninc.com/index.php Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adam Posted March 12, 2008 Share Posted March 12, 2008 The designs a little basic, looks good for a start but needs work. Banner looks a little too thin and doesn't really fit in.. Generally needs a bit more colour and a bit more detail, too bland in my opinion... Content wise it needs improving, seem to have capital letters in the middle of sentences and gappy text.. incomplete paragraphs, lots of line breaks, doesn't flow too well... overall the grammar isn't too good... also I'm not too sure what the difference between 'Spikeon Inc' and 'Naked Monkeys' is? Adam Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheFilmGod Posted March 12, 2008 Share Posted March 12, 2008 In our Opinion, W3C standards were a silly silly creation meant to make us rip out all of our hair, thus making us naked monkeys. In our angst, we will not go out of our way to make our code confirm to any standards. But we will make sure that our code looks good in every browser known to man (and monkey). You are a disgrace to all monkeys and men. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spikeon Posted March 13, 2008 Author Share Posted March 13, 2008 i'm sorry that i don't want to put all of my h2's inside of obj tags which is what the validator tells me to do Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheFilmGod Posted March 13, 2008 Share Posted March 13, 2008 i'm sorry that i don't want to put all of my h2's inside of obj tags which is what the validator tells me to do That still doesn't mean you can't follow other set guidelines/standards. From what I've read, you don't follow standards at all! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spikeon Posted March 13, 2008 Author Share Posted March 13, 2008 look, link me to a HTML validator, and i'll use it, i haven't found one XHTML validators plain old piss me off, because i code,. HTML Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spikeon Posted March 13, 2008 Author Share Posted March 13, 2008 <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd"> <html> <head> <meta http-equiv="Content-type" content="text/html;charset=UTF-8"> noone informed me of that...ever... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheFilmGod Posted March 13, 2008 Share Posted March 13, 2008 http://validator.w3.org/ validating code isn't the only thing to being standard compliant. You should also aim to have accessiblity through the use of <h1> <h2> tags, alt tags, proper semantic code, don't use tables, use external stylesheets unless it's a special ocassion... you get the idea. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spikeon Posted March 13, 2008 Author Share Posted March 13, 2008 well, the thing is that i'd post a site here, and then people would validate it, and get 500 errors because it presumes its XHTML Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheFilmGod Posted March 15, 2008 Share Posted March 15, 2008 well, the thing is that i'd post a site here, and then people would validate it, and get 500 errors because it presumes its XHTML That explains why your site is about "naked monkeys"... The link I gave you for the validator figures out whether or not it is html/xhtml by extracting the doctype. It then parses according to it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spikeon Posted March 15, 2008 Author Share Posted March 15, 2008 well, now that i know that html still exists, and wasn't REPLACED by xhtml, i changed the site to fix, and at least the front page validates the rest of them don't because i use coded-in GET commands, and since it has a & in it, it thinks its gotta be a that it can't recognise.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheFilmGod Posted March 16, 2008 Share Posted March 16, 2008 well, now that i know that html still exists, and wasn't REPLACED by xhtml, i changed the site to fix, and at least the front page validates the rest of them don't because i use coded-in GET commands, and since it has a & in it, it thinks its gotta be a that it can't recognise.... The homepage still doesn't validate. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.