Daniel0

I'll have to agree with premiso. I think some people wouldn't like the privacy implications it'll have as well.

I've lowered the requirements for password strength.

You could do that. It's a bit messy though.

Regardless of the hashing algorithm you choose you need to use salting to make brute forcing and dictionary attacks more difficult. I'd recommend an application wide static salt that never changes coupled with perhaps a user specific salt that changes e.g. when logging in. I'd probably go with a strong hashing algorithm like SHA-512 available through the hash() function. As for changing the algorithm, that's a bit more difficult. You could keep the current password and then create a new field called "password_new" or something like that. When authenticating you'd check if password_new is empty and then use the old algorithm. Seeing as the password is supplied when authenticating you'll be able to update to the new algorithm. This means, however, that you'll still be vulnerable to attacks using the old algorithm's weaknesses. Another option would be to simply require all users to reset their passwords and send them an email informing them about it. The former has security implications, but is transparent to the user. The latter is more secure, but isn't transparent and requires the user to actively do something.

I overlooked this. It won't protect you from what you intended, but it's excellent for blocking CSRF attacks.

Sure it'll be safer than plain text, but I only think it'll be marginally safer. Hashing it without a salt or with a publicly known salt isn't really that secure. HTTPS is secure because it encrypts it using the public key of the server, and the server can decrypt it using its private key. You can just make a self signed certificate or get a really cheap one. SSL is SSL regardless of the price you paid for the cert. It'll be the same encryption. The more expensive certs are expensive because they verify who the person/site is as well. You can only do it for passwords and other info you don't ever need in plaintext again though. Email addresses don't work using your method.

Uhm... SSL?

I haven't had more problems with Vista than any other OS.

moved.

I'll scream rape... Heh... the v flag wasn't even supposed to be there

Well, I mean what I said... E.g. counting blank lines: grep -c '^$' test.txt Number of lines: wc -l test.txt If you do not have access to a GNU/Linux install then you can use cygwin.

You should be able to do all that using unix command line tools.

An HP dv9685eo. No luck with that. Strangely, the bios settings contain virtually no options for me to change. Mostly only the date and boot order.

Hmm... I'm not so sure about that. I get sound through the built-in speakers when there is no driver installed after all. Regardless, I'll be equally (un)lucky if the new mobo is broken or if there is a loose wire. I'll still have to turn it in and do without it for like three weeks again. I'll not be paying anything as I have an extended SLA that covers repair costs.

I hope someone can help me solve this issue. I just got my laptop back from repair, but now there is no sound. If I remove the drivers then I can get sound through the internal speakers, but the jack plugs do not work and inserting e.g. a headset into them won't mute the speakers. When the drivers are installed there is no sound whatsoever. The sound card is detected by the OS (Vista x64, but that's irrelevant because it doesn't work in Ubuntu either) and it claims to be playing sound, but nothing comes out. One of the things they did at repair was replacing the motherboard. Can anyone provide a logical reason to why this would happen, or even better, a solution to the problem? I don't really feel like turning it in for repair again.

http://blogs.zdnet.com/Bott/?p=659 Here it's reported that for regular people there will only be three ones to choose between. Edit: The engadget link posted by nrg_alpha also says only three seeing as "Enterprise" is "available only in volume licenses" and that "Home Basic" is "only available in emerging markets" and "Starter" is otherwise not available normally. That leaves home premium, pro, and ultimate left.

Use http://img.youtube.com/vi/VIDEO_ID/default.jpg

Yes, I'm in this kind of school. I think in Denmark that math courses aren't divided into specialized topics until university. I mentioned previously that math in my kind of school are split in A/B/C and that I have B. I'm going to study computer science and for that I'll need A which, in addition to everything C and B encompass, covers (by looking at the TOC for the textbook in the series we use, but for A level) vectors and analytical geometry, infinitesimals, and differential equations. For computer science on the university it appears that in addition to that, the courses "discrete mathematical structures" and "linear algebra" are required. Then there are of course even more advanced math depending on what courses you choose (e.g. cryptology or stuff dealing with images or sound).

http://www.whoishostingthis.com/twcgreaterboston.org => http://www.interland.com/

The following is an example of a one of the tasks that might be at an exam at B level math (out of A, B, C, where A is highest and C is lowest): Dunno if that's more complex than whatever you're given. The curriculum ranges over multiple subjects such as functions and graphs, statistics, trigonometry, differentiation, integration, etc.

Ah. At our written exams we have 1 hour without aids and 4 hours with all aids excluding communication with other people (thus also excluding internet). At oral exams they mostly just want us to be able to do proofs and possibly apply knowledge about a particular area of mathematics. Regular homework is usually also with aids.

Do they allow you to solve it using CAS?

It's not too difficult. The book tricked me though. The question mentioned above wasn't really about calculus even though it was along with a lot of other questions about integrals, it was checking that I knew WTF factorization was, which I of course had forgotten.

It used to be higher. Like 12%.

On PHP Freaks, 7.69% of the visits where using IE6.