Jump to content

Windows 7


The Little Guy

Recommended Posts

I could be wrong, but I thought the problems with Xbox360 was software related, not hardware.  That is, the software companies rushed to get the games out on time so they didn't really test their stuff.  I don't think that's microsoft's fault...

 

Anyways, I'll accept it's possible a good chunk of MS "falling behind" is due to being "smug" up there "on top." But I think another thing to look at is that they are simply spreading themselves too thin, as a company.  Yes, they have a lot of money to throw at things, but look at how many things they have their fingers in.  I bet even Mr. Gates himself doesn't know what all his company does, lol. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 181
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I could be wrong, but I thought the problems with Xbox360 was software related, not hardware.  That is, the software companies rushed to get the games out on time so they didn't really test their stuff.  I don't think that's microsoft's fault...

 

The problems (reports) deal with internal system overheating due to poor ventilation... Apparently, the heat build up internally was enough to warp the boards that the cheaply soldered components came slightly loose (thus those components could no longer function properly). There are reports that the 360 designers even warned MS that there was more time needed to iron out some of the issues regarding ventilation prior to launch. MS apparently has ignored those requests, skimped out on costs by using cheaper soldering among other things which collectively all added up to overheating units and such. It got so bad, MS even made some official cooling docking stations to help qualm the situation. All in all.. this 'rushed' product has cost MS a lot of money ($1 Billion +). So in the end, does it pay to rush things like this out the door for saved R&D dollars and getting a head start ahead of the competition?

 

I can say it has nothing to do with software whatsoever. So yes, MS is very much a fault in this case. It will be veeerry interesting to see what kind of hardware MS comes up with for their 'xbox 720' next gen system. Some lessons are learned the very hard and very expensive way. Time will tell I suppose.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ah okay, I didn't know there were hardware issues, as well.  But I recently read an article (will post it if I can find it) that talked about a lot of games having bugs, as well...basically releasing beta versions as final releases, to push them out sooner.  Basically the author of the article said "Wtf, if I wanted to pay a company for the privilege of being a beta tester, I would buy an MMO on my PC.  And I can understand PC games having bugs, because they have to cater to so many systems, hardwares, setups, etc.. but when you're a company that's working with one system with one set of hardware...you know wtf you're dealing with."  All in all it was a pretty entertaining article :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ah okay, I didn't know there were hardware issues, as well.  But I recently read an article (will post it if I can find it) that talked about a lot of games having bugs, as well...basically releasing beta versions as final releases, to push them out sooner.  Basically the author of the article said "Wtf, if I wanted to pay a company for the privilege of being a beta tester, I would buy an MMO on my PC.  And I can understand PC games having bugs, because they have to cater to so many systems, hardwares, setups, etc.. but when you're a company that's working with one system with one set of hardware...you know wtf you're dealing with."  All in all it was a pretty entertaining article :P

 

I agree.. Bad software is not MS's fault (unless the game in question is developed internally by a game division owned and operated by MS themselves ;) )

The problem with game development is that not all developers are equally talented, have the same budgets / deadlines, QA processes, etc..) So yes, for the games that are crappy, no one can blame MS on that one. This is why I rent games first.. If its stable and good, then I may contemplate purchasing it. Otherwise, I only lost a couple of bucks for 5 days as opposed to $60-70 ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ah okay, I didn't know there were hardware issues, as well.  But I recently read an article (will post it if I can find it) that talked about a lot of games having bugs, as well...basically releasing beta versions as final releases, to push them out sooner.  Basically the author of the article said "Wtf, if I wanted to pay a company for the privilege of being a beta tester, I would buy an MMO on my PC.  And I can understand PC games having bugs, because they have to cater to so many systems, hardwares, setups, etc.. but when you're a company that's working with one system with one set of hardware...you know wtf you're dealing with."  All in all it was a pretty entertaining article :P

 

my favourite comment in an article discussing lag/video performance issues in console games (with regards to the one system with one set of hardware) was this:  it's like giving us an L-shaped condom; you know what we're working with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is all the assembly code, to start a basic c++ OS:

 

; Loader.asm

[bITS 32] ; protected mode

[global start] 
[extern _main]       ; this is our C++ code
[extern __main]    ; this is our C support code
[extern __atexit]

start:
call __main
call _main    ; call our C++ code
call __atexit

cli    ; interrupts will disturb the halt
hlt    ; halt the CPU

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I will be leaving OS programming to the people who do that kind of thing.  Even if I had the ability, I wouldn't want to waste the time.

 

 

 

Oh, by the way, that doesn't look like asm to me TLG.  At least not true ASM.

 

Yeah...that's not really truly programming your own OS.  You're still using built in routines/functions/etc from a low level language/compiler. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure what Windows is coded in.

 

An OS could theoretically be written in any language, as long as it's possible to compile it.

 

 

And yes, it's possible to make a program without a language.  All languages do technically compile down to asm, and asm is just instructions for the processor.  Then the processor does stuff on a physical level.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Then how else would you make an OS? If you didn't have a language, then you couldn't make a program, such as an OS.

 

I believe that I had read that Windows was created with C or C++.

 

LoL that sounds a lot like a "Which came first, the chicken or the egg?" argument.  Yes, it is possible to use pure asm to program.  ASM itself is a programming language, actually. It's the lowest level you can get, short of directly feeding 1's and 0's into the hardware.  So technically, even using pure ASM is still using a language, albeit, direct processor language.  It's easier to understand if you look into how computers work on a physical level.  Go back to high-school days with the example of a string of lightbulbs being turned off and on in different patterns :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

windows 7..........how bout vista is fixed.

 

I have to use it at work and so far it is completely unstable at times.....komodo edit crashes for me repeatedly throughout the day, firefox allways bugs out and forces me to uninstall/reinstall.

And then again all the clicks i have to run through just to start certain programs.....

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

windows 7..........how bout vista is fixed.

 

I have to use it at work and so far it is completely unstable at times.....komodo edit crashes for me repeatedly throughout the day, firefox allways bugs out and forces me to uninstall/reinstall.

And then again all the clicks i have to run through just to start certain programs.....

 

Either you 1) don't meet the requirements, or 2) somehow messed up your install. My Vista install works great.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Firefox has crashed maybe 3 times on me in the past year, and all of those times it was either my own or a website's fault.

 

 

 

I don't believe it's fair to say the OS is bad because two programs crash under it.  (Unless, of course, you can prove that Vista somehow directly caused the crash, and it would be impossible for the makers of said program to fix the problem.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

windows 7..........how bout vista is fixed.

 

I have to use it at work and so far it is completely unstable at times.....komodo edit crashes for me repeatedly throughout the day, firefox allways bugs out and forces me to uninstall/reinstall.

And then again all the clicks i have to run through just to start certain programs.....

 

Either you 1) don't meet the requirements, or 2) somehow messed up your install. My Vista install works great.

 

Or 3.) Your computer is full of viruses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also, isn't the job of the program to be compatible with the OS, not the other way around?

 

What I had in mind was some kind of fault of the OS where something was working unexpectedly.  Like a messed up sys call of some kind or something.

 

I see.  Just seems to me that most "Windows sucks" posts involve bitching that people's programs lock, crash, etc... and that's somehow the OS's fault.  I mean, it could be.  But I doubt it.  Especially when it comes to people bitching about vista.  There's a good possibility they are running 64-bit.  64-bit technology has just hit the mainstream market (relatively) recently.  Recent enough that the only companies that have updated their software to be compatible are the ones that charge hundreds of dollars for their products. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I remember when Vista first came out and drivers were non existent for a lot of products.  People somehow blamed the OS on that.  I guess MS should've worked more closely with hardware manufacturers, but bleh, it just bugged me how it was automatically Microsoft's fault.

 

 

"Just seems to me that most "Windows sucks" posts involve bitching that people's programs lock, crash, etc... and that's somehow the OS's fault."

 

 

My desktop publishing (a frustratingly boring and easy class) teacher thought that the auto save feature of Word (where if you're typing something and the e-world ends it saves it) was because of Vista.  She told us in the middle of like a presentation thingy where she was 'teaching' us how to use mice and what not.  I raised my hand and explained how I figured it worked.  lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is more than a year old. Please don't revive it unless you have something important to add.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.