Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Whatever content the client submits to you (pictures, text etc) is already owned by them. That means that they already have content copyright. The design copyright is owned by you. You don't have to place a notice on their website concerning your ownership of the design if you don't want to (I don't think any developer really does this - they just put their link at the end). If you give over to them, the design copyright of the website, you should charge them alot more, as that means that you can't re-use any of the code or graphics.

Link to comment
https://forums.phpfreaks.com/topic/170721-contract-form/#findComment-900766
Share on other sites

Are you sure about that? If I'm paying someone to create something for me, I think it's reasonable to expect that full ownership will be transferred too me unless otherwise stated in a contract. If I pay someone to build me a house, I expect that I'll actually own the house. I don't see why it's different with a website.

 

Also, if you're at work and you write a piece of software. Obviously you'll not retain ownership of what you wrote. You did it on company time and they paid you to do it. As far as I'm concerned, it's not different just because you're a freelancer and isn't physically in the client's house (or whatever) doing it.

 

If you want to retain partial or full ownership of things you did for a client you should specify it in the contract.

Link to comment
https://forums.phpfreaks.com/topic/170721-contract-form/#findComment-900786
Share on other sites

Are you sure about that? If I'm paying someone to create something for me, I think it's reasonable to expect that full ownership will be transferred too me unless otherwise stated in a contract

Not really.

All applications I develop I still maintain 100% ownership of the source code. The client is effectively purchasing a licence to use it. If you were to hand over the rights to the source code then your client could have the right to prevent you using that code in any other project you work on. Just like buying a copy of microsoft office. You have the licence to install and use the product but microsoft still owns the rights to the source code preventing you making modifications if it were available.

Link to comment
https://forums.phpfreaks.com/topic/170721-contract-form/#findComment-900845
Share on other sites

Not really.

All applications I develop I still maintain 100% ownership of the source code. The client is effectively purchasing a licence to use it. If you were to hand over the rights to the source code then your client could have the right to prevent you using that code in any other project you work on. Just like buying a copy of microsoft office. You have the licence to install and use the product but microsoft still owns the rights to the source code preventing you making modifications if it were available.

 

That's how I work, I thought everyone worked like that...

Link to comment
https://forums.phpfreaks.com/topic/170721-contract-form/#findComment-900858
Share on other sites

so how to get the form ready? Cant find any in google either.

Thats because there is no set form. You dont need to do anything fantastic. Get clients to sign off a specification document including your terms (only you know what your terms are). Just lay it out simple

i.e.

 

Objective

Specification

Functionality

Web Hosting

Price

Terms

Cost of modifications, etc

 

Link to comment
https://forums.phpfreaks.com/topic/170721-contract-form/#findComment-900861
Share on other sites

Are you sure about that? If I'm paying someone to create something for me, I think it's reasonable to expect that full ownership will be transferred too me unless otherwise stated in a contract. If I pay someone to build me a house, I expect that I'll actually own the house. I don't see why it's different with a website.

 

Also, if you're at work and you write a piece of software. Obviously you'll not retain ownership of what you wrote. You did it on company time and they paid you to do it. As far as I'm concerned, it's not different just because you're a freelancer and isn't physically in the client's house (or whatever) doing it.

 

If you want to retain partial or full ownership of things you did for a client you should specify it in the contract.

 

so what about 3rd party scripts that are more often than not used?  Shopping carts, content management systems, frameworks, etc.. ?  Client is not receiving full 100% ownership of those things.

 

I never charge clients for scripts anyways.  My fees are always based on $$/hr as far as reviewing/writing/installing/fixing/etc.. stuff.  In other words, people pay for my time.

 

 

Link to comment
https://forums.phpfreaks.com/topic/170721-contract-form/#findComment-900881
Share on other sites

Are you sure about that? If I'm paying someone to create something for me, I think it's reasonable to expect that full ownership will be transferred too me unless otherwise stated in a contract

Not really.

All applications I develop I still maintain 100% ownership of the source code. The client is effectively purchasing a licence to use it. If you were to hand over the rights to the source code then your client could have the right to prevent you using that code in any other project you work on. Just like buying a copy of microsoft office. You have the licence to install and use the product but microsoft still owns the rights to the source code preventing you making modifications if it were available.

 

There is a difference between buying a mass-distributed product that you can buy in a retail store and hiring a team of developers to write an entirely new product from scratch.

 

I'll still hold on to my statement that you'll have to specify in the contract if you wish to retain partial of full ownership as a developer/designer.

 

Note however, that the copyright of course only applies to the work as a whole, not parts of it. For instance, I'm reading a book right now, and there is a sentence that says "Suppose now that A and B are finite subsets of a universal set U." That sentence cannot be copyrighted. I could formulate that sentence entirely independently of that book, but it's highly unlikely that I would write the same book, or even a chapter in the book independently.

 

Therefore, the "your client could have the right to prevent you using that code in any other project you work on" argument doesn't hold. He would prevent you from reusing the project in its entirety (and reasonably so, IMO), but not individual components that are too generic to be copyrighted anyway.

 

Selling a license to a commercial product and selling custom development as a service are two entirely different things.

 

so what about 3rd party scripts that are more often than not used?  Shopping carts, content management systems, frameworks, etc.. ?  Client is not receiving full 100% ownership of those things.

 

No, of course not. You cannot reassign ownership of something you do not own. Nor can you sell something you do not own. I'm exclusively talking about code you specifically wrote for the client, or artwork you created for the client.

Link to comment
https://forums.phpfreaks.com/topic/170721-contract-form/#findComment-900915
Share on other sites

100% agreed with you daniel bro. Dont know why some people demand their name and link when they are being paid whats the sense of keeping name etc in design. I once did that only when the client said it was ok if i leave my name in the template.

 

I'm sorry but if you choose not to put your link on the bottom of a client's website, you are stupid.

Link to comment
https://forums.phpfreaks.com/topic/170721-contract-form/#findComment-900992
Share on other sites

ok again for the second time in this forum u being rude to me wayne. N why should i put my name and link when they have paid me for it? Then this way nobody wil hire anybody to get a site done. coz it wil be a waste for them. Think also from a clients point of view.

Link to comment
https://forums.phpfreaks.com/topic/170721-contract-form/#findComment-901028
Share on other sites

ok again for the second time in this forum u being rude to me wayne. N why should i put my name and link when they have paid me for it? Then this way nobody wil hire anybody to get a site done. coz it wil be a waste for them. Think also from a clients point of view.

 

I'm being honest. The majority of your future clients will most likely be people that seen a website you designed and then followed the footer link to your website. If that link isn't there, you're losing out on referrals AND the possibility of having better search engine rankings. And why would it be a waste of time? It's only a small link in the footer? As long as it's not eye catching and heavier in weight than the rest of the site's visual features, it's not going to cause any harm to anyone.

Link to comment
https://forums.phpfreaks.com/topic/170721-contract-form/#findComment-901089
Share on other sites

In fact, this is the footer on PHP Freaks:

 

	<div id="footer">
	<p id="links">Designed by and developed by <a href="http://www.multimedia-technologies.com">Multimedia Technologies</a> and <a href="http://degeberg.com">Daniel Egeberg</a></p>
	<p>Copyright © PHP Freaks | <a href="http://www.thewebfreaks.com">The Web Freaks</a></p>
</div>

 

81.43% of my visits come from phpfreaks.com. Then again, my website is shit, so there is not really anything to see there.

Link to comment
https://forums.phpfreaks.com/topic/170721-contract-form/#findComment-901094
Share on other sites

ok again for the second time in this forum u being rude to me wayne. N why should i put my name and link when they have paid me for it? Then this way nobody wil hire anybody to get a site done. coz it wil be a waste for them. Think also from a clients point of view.

 

I don't think wayne was attacking you specifically, but the notion of not putting a link at the bottom of a page, in general.  Having a "powered by/made by/etc.." link at the bottom is actually pretty common for most small/medium sized sites.  The only people who don't really do that is bigger companies, and they don't do that because they pay a lot of extra money to not have stuff like that.  Which usually involves having everything custom made from scratch in the first place, because a lot of 3rd party stuff requires you to have a link, as part of the ToS/license. 

Link to comment
https://forums.phpfreaks.com/topic/170721-contract-form/#findComment-901097
Share on other sites

When I was doing the agency stuff, I would always write up my bids padding a little bit and offering a discount for adding my company and link to the bottom of their site.  Most clients would be happy to take the discount, though some would be happy to just pay me the extra money, which worked for me. It seemed to work out well for both parties, never ran into any issues either way.

Link to comment
https://forums.phpfreaks.com/topic/170721-contract-form/#findComment-901102
Share on other sites

Whatever content the client submits to you (pictures, text etc) is already owned by them. That means that they already have content copyright. The design copyright is owned by you.

 

I think this is dependant on the copyright laws of the country in question. In the US for example, unless there is some 'Work for hire' type clause (or something along those lines), the content creator (author) retains the copyrights (as by default, the person responsible for creation is the author, and thus retains authorship / copyrights).. the client basically pays for the rights to use that content. If there is a Work for hire type clause however, then the client owns all the material the author creates (the author relinquishes authorship/copyright ownership).

 

In Canada, it's the inverse by default.. When a client pays, anything the author creates for that client under that contract is owned by the client. This makes for potentially messy understandings between say a client in Canada paying for the services of someone in the US. Depending on which country the contract is bound to (and assuming there is no explicit 'Work for hire' type clause within that contract), there could be potential legal issues that ensue as a result.

 

Gotta love law.

Link to comment
https://forums.phpfreaks.com/topic/170721-contract-form/#findComment-901128
Share on other sites

This thread is more than a year old. Please don't revive it unless you have something important to add.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.