oni-kun

How do you expect one code to magically get the result of another code without directly interacting with it? I'm not sure what you're meaning about not being able to include it. What is your need to get the session ID? I'm sure if you'd tell us we could find a better solution to the problem at hand.

The session can be set (Or if lazy cookie/GET/hiddenfield) but it would make more sense if you told us the scope of what you wish this for, example: <input type="hidden" name="submitter" value="<?php print $_SERVER['REQUEST_URI']; ?>"> ... print $_POST['submitter'] . "Submitted the form!";

Yeah, something about the greens being too, er, not too similar but not too different either, I'm not sure how to take that on the blog part. (lol @ http://www.andrewodendaal.com/worst-websites-of-all-time/) Your search box looks a bit better, still a smidge off (Atleast in FF) but the overall theme is quite appealing when I look back at it, I like it alot.

I'm not sure what you're trying to do. Are you saying the page is not within your accessabilty? Then you cannot capture the session ID like that. If you are able to require it (which should be) then it'll pass the variables natively, Using file_get_contents or CURL will only be able to capture a SESSID cookie, Nothing more. You cannot get a workable session from that.

The OR and || operators are both correct. You are not following the statement though, Consider this correction: $q001 == "right" || $q001 == "right2" You can only use another statement, You cannot use "This or that", it has to be "if this = this OR this = that" If you wish for a more "automated" method, you can define an array. $correct_answers = Array('right', 'right2'); if (in_array($q001, $correct_answers)) { $q001score = 1; } else { $q001score = 0; } This will save you from typing a pile of IF/AND/OR statements provided you add to the array. EDIT: Updated another method.

Note you're calling the session on a file that is not included, Why would you expect it to be set?

From way back when, When I did VB .NET: Object Oriented Programming in VB.Net VB.NET Code Level Security Handbook And other for web, Generic really: O'Reilly Web Security Testing Cookbook O'Reilly Apache Security HTTP Developer's Handbook A few others from the library awhile back I can't remember, I really should get a few on MySQL/Regular expressions, It'd fill in a lot of the content that is beyond what I can get from the web. (Maybe I can be of more actual help, hehe.) My birthday is in a week, Maybe i'll fetch some for myself. Note to self: Bookmark this page for things to buy.

What if there was a magical string that, I don't know, was a dynamic string.

Nice use of those strikes.

My age is on my profile

You've asked for a business model that fits the criteria, and I gave you one. There's nothing stopping you from writing your own for your own needs. You want them to be physically employed to you?

Cheating google? A reputable host tracker has this at the bottom: keywords: downtime, ping trace, server monitor, tracker, website test, server test, ping traceroute, traceroute ping, ping ip, internet connection test, network connection, dns test, internet speed connection, test website, website testing, speed connection, ping website, check speed, connection test, ping test, connection speed test, trace ip, trace route, bandwidth test, reverse dns lookup, internet connection speed test, test internet speed, traceroute, test speed, internet connection, ip lookup, broadband test, online check, broadband speed test, network tools, nslookup, online tests, ping, reverse lookup, speed test, speedtest, trace, tracert If you read up on keyword injection, It's been done since the beginning of the SE's existed, They look for content in H1's/etc and stop looking after a certain number of similar keywords without too much penalty. Anywho.. The page looks much better, although the search box is slightly smaller (On FF) than the top bar just enough to make it look odd, 1/2 size or full would be prefferable but speaking of size, the "Software Services" / "Blog" / "Hide Me" images are a tad too big for appeal. The blog section looks very nice (uniqueness style/colour contrast wise) but the text isn't the best in readability, especially the harsher reds and blues. EDIT: Didn't notice the colours changed each time. Just the dark dark blue and the maroonish styles.

I think it's suppose to look like a notepad. I think it is a premade template too.. judging by the footer. Yeah, I'm not sure but I think it is premade. Seems the OP is stuck in a pickle of design, The most gruling part of webmastering.

http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/freelance

Yes, It's called freelancing.

A few programming books I've admired, to be gotten at Amazon. Maybe a couple dozen pairs of lounge pants so I don't have to wash them so often. My computers already have enough thousands put into them, enough so the "latest foo-fah" won't be worth upgrading to for a few more years to come. All I want right now is to go to somewhere fancy cheap and order pizza for dinner.

Some simply just don't like Chrome (Or they'd rather have their internal browser default and use Firefox or another for only external use). Reminds me of FF 2.0 and their problematic DDEexec registry entries opening urls via parameters..

allow_url_fopen and allow_url_include must be turned on in php.ini (or propriertary .htaccess) before you are able to do this. It was most likely not set up on your server and must be changed by hand. An example .htaccess setup with these values would be: php_value allow_url_fopen 1 php_value allow_url_include 1 This would allow external addresses to be included, Just note the security risks of CSRF and simple file security practises before you enable this.

I heavily agree with MrAdam. Maybe you should make it a little more serverside.

An open source x-platform implementation isn't .NET, Especially in the job market.

I know that, Ignore the reality and look at the concept that there are people at times here or there, and what would be "ideal" is atleast someone there some time in the week to help someone, and if there is, that person may be able to get a few things down on the more personal side (save for pm'ing), There may never be many people there as it's not convenient to, but it's the only thing that will be constructed in reality of its kind. I doubt they'll be some quick Q&A thread, unless it were purged, but that would be even greater a mundane task than "creating" it. There are possibly infinite ideas, with atleast with one or two grains of respect or value or truth to them, but the reality of that is quite possibly none of them will be looked at as they skew from basic motives of a forum, To post, to get lost in time, to be discovered by another generation of people who may be interested in programming, bla bla ..

On topic supportive thoughts about the thread was too much? Why don't you grow up and follow what you're preaching.

Yes. Note 40 years back was the Unix epoch, There's obviously a flaw in your logical calculations.

What?