Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Dont, Dont even then about posting it

 

FF3 may be the most downloaded file on the internet(recoreded)

But is its Cr*p its CSS interpriter is Patatic and its Javascript is worse

 

if you have problems wiht a site running on FF3 and it runs fine of FF2 LEAVE it dont mess with it hopefully Mozila will fix that mess of a program so it works like FF2 did and loads sites properly

Link to comment
https://forums.phpfreaks.com/topic/122888-just-a-quick-comment-about-ff3/
Share on other sites

First of all, your spelling isn't glamorous. Firefox 3 is obviously not Firefox 2. And Firefox is obviously not Internet Explorer. So obviously there will be differences. Maybe you just happen to like Firefox 2 and are accustomed to coding with it.

 

It's fine if you don't feel the need to work with Firefox 3, but a lot of people will be using it, so if you're running a site, I would suggest you accommodate to it. I mean if you managed to deal with Internet Explorer, I don't see why Firefox 3 is that big of an issue.

Dont, Dont even then about posting it

 

FF3 may be the most downloaded file on the internet(recoreded)

But is its Cr*p its CSS interpriter is Patatic and its Javascript is worse

 

if you have problems wiht a site running on FF3 and it runs fine of FF2 LEAVE it dont mess with it hopefully Mozila will fix that mess of a program so it works like FF2 did and loads sites properly

I find that hard to believe. All my page layouts work flawlessly on FF3, even though they was designed/tested using FF2.

 

Maybe you should make sure you're following the HTML/CSS standards, you can check this by using the HTML/CSS validators provided by w3c.org

Firefox 3 owns.

 

I would venture to guess that most of the time, if something between FF3 and FF2 looks differently, then FF3 is the one displaying it correctly.

 

 

Don't bad mouth someone's (in this case a group's) good work just because you can't get a page to look right in it.  God.

Um... the reason why FF3 sucks at rendering your page is because you are designing a website w/out understanding semantics. I think your poor spelling and grammar shows that you aren't "grammatically" correct in english - and I think it is safe to assume that you aren't "semantically" correct in html code.  ;)

This thread is more than a year old. Please don't revive it unless you have something important to add.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.