barkermn01 Posted September 5, 2008 Share Posted September 5, 2008 Dont, Dont even then about posting it FF3 may be the most downloaded file on the internet(recoreded) But is its Cr*p its CSS interpriter is Patatic and its Javascript is worse if you have problems wiht a site running on FF3 and it runs fine of FF2 LEAVE it dont mess with it hopefully Mozila will fix that mess of a program so it works like FF2 did and loads sites properly Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ken2k7 Posted September 5, 2008 Share Posted September 5, 2008 First of all, your spelling isn't glamorous. Firefox 3 is obviously not Firefox 2. And Firefox is obviously not Internet Explorer. So obviously there will be differences. Maybe you just happen to like Firefox 2 and are accustomed to coding with it. It's fine if you don't feel the need to work with Firefox 3, but a lot of people will be using it, so if you're running a site, I would suggest you accommodate to it. I mean if you managed to deal with Internet Explorer, I don't see why Firefox 3 is that big of an issue. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wildteen88 Posted September 6, 2008 Share Posted September 6, 2008 Dont, Dont even then about posting it FF3 may be the most downloaded file on the internet(recoreded) But is its Cr*p its CSS interpriter is Patatic and its Javascript is worse if you have problems wiht a site running on FF3 and it runs fine of FF2 LEAVE it dont mess with it hopefully Mozila will fix that mess of a program so it works like FF2 did and loads sites properly I find that hard to believe. All my page layouts work flawlessly on FF3, even though they was designed/tested using FF2. Maybe you should make sure you're following the HTML/CSS standards, you can check this by using the HTML/CSS validators provided by w3c.org Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.josh Posted September 6, 2008 Share Posted September 6, 2008 What's a patatic? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zq29 Posted September 6, 2008 Share Posted September 6, 2008 I haven't had any issues with FF3 either, all my sites display exactly as they do in FF2 and none of my usual sites I visit have had any issues either... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daniel0 Posted September 6, 2008 Share Posted September 6, 2008 I'll second (fourth?) that Gecko 1.9 works fine for me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
corbin Posted September 6, 2008 Share Posted September 6, 2008 Firefox 3 owns. I would venture to guess that most of the time, if something between FF3 and FF2 looks differently, then FF3 is the one displaying it correctly. Don't bad mouth someone's (in this case a group's) good work just because you can't get a page to look right in it. God. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GingerRobot Posted September 6, 2008 Share Posted September 6, 2008 Don't bad mouth someone's (in this case a group's) good work just because you can't get a page to look right in it. God. Though, if the group happens to be the team behind IE, it might be acceptable... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheFilmGod Posted September 7, 2008 Share Posted September 7, 2008 Um... the reason why FF3 sucks at rendering your page is because you are designing a website w/out understanding semantics. I think your poor spelling and grammar shows that you aren't "grammatically" correct in english - and I think it is safe to assume that you aren't "semantically" correct in html code. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
corbin Posted September 7, 2008 Share Posted September 7, 2008 Don't bad mouth someone's (in this case a group's) good work just because you can't get a page to look right in it. God. Though, if the group happens to be the team behind IE, it might be acceptable... I said good work. ;p Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GingerRobot Posted September 7, 2008 Share Posted September 7, 2008 Touché Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LemonInflux Posted September 7, 2008 Share Posted September 7, 2008 FF3 displays pages fine for me. I can't find anything wrong with it actually. Just to support the above posters: go firefox Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mchl Posted September 7, 2008 Share Posted September 7, 2008 I had one issue when FF3 came out, but it was because my code was invalid. One change and it looks good in both browsers now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JasonLewis Posted September 7, 2008 Share Posted September 7, 2008 FF3 is lord of all browsers. IE is lucky to scrape in as a mere peasant. Bah, IE must die. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mchl Posted September 7, 2008 Share Posted September 7, 2008 Lords can;t exist without peasants... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JasonLewis Posted September 8, 2008 Share Posted September 8, 2008 And that is why browsers like Safari exist. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.