jcombs_31 Posted May 8, 2009 Share Posted May 8, 2009 http://ajaxian.com/archives/3d-cube-using-new-css-transformations I think the future of CSS and Html is going to improve greatly, allowing for some nice control options without the use of graphics. While there is nothing particularly exciting about this demonstration, it is the new features that are intriguing. I just wish we didn't have to worry about coding different to different browsers. What is the point of the W3C if there is no strict adherence to standards. I just wish everyone could get on the same page! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Philip Posted May 9, 2009 Share Posted May 9, 2009 I just wish we didn't have to worry about coding different to different browsers. What is the point of the W3C if there is no strict adherence to standards. This is why I hate front-end coding, such a pain. That is pretty cool, the cube.... but honestly, how often would you use it? Nonetheless, I can't wait for CSS3 to become the new standard with all the browsers, some cool stuff in there Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nrg_alpha Posted May 9, 2009 Share Posted May 9, 2009 Nonetheless, I can't wait for CSS3 to become the new standard with all the browsers [chop] That will never happen as realistically, by the time IE (10?) fully supports CSS3, the others will already have already moved on to CSS 4 (or 5). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ken2k7 Posted May 9, 2009 Share Posted May 9, 2009 Would CSS3 have the same differences between display on IE 6, IE 7, FF2 and FF3 as with CSS2? I know how to make CSS2 to look fine on all 4 of those browsers because my job does a lot of layout design. I hope I don't have to learn new stuff when CSS3 comes out. What a drag... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Philip Posted May 9, 2009 Share Posted May 9, 2009 Nonetheless, I can't wait for CSS3 to become the new standard with all the browsers [chop] That will never happen as realistically, by the time IE (10?) fully supports CSS3, the others will already have already moved on to CSS 4 (or 5). True dat. Although, I will admit IE8 is doing pretty good compared to the past versions Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nrg_alpha Posted May 9, 2009 Share Posted May 9, 2009 No doubt about that...8 is definitely an nice improvement to be sure (god, did I just compliment MS? *Aack!*). They'll have to keep on rolling if they want to catch up to the other browsers in future releases. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daniel0 Posted May 9, 2009 Share Posted May 9, 2009 Though IE8 is certainly much better than the previous versions, it's still behind its competitors. They have to work harder on the rendering engine instead of the GUI. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.josh Posted May 9, 2009 Share Posted May 9, 2009 That is pretty cool, the cube.... but honestly, how often would you use it? QFT. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fabrydesign Posted May 10, 2009 Share Posted May 10, 2009 That is pretty cool, the cube.... but honestly, how often would you use it? I think we're all going to be saying this until someone does something brilliant and puts us all in awe and suddenly we'll see everyone using it in a ripped-off kind of fashion... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daniel0 Posted May 10, 2009 Share Posted May 10, 2009 That is pretty cool, the cube.... but honestly, how often would you use it? 64 kB RAM ought to be enough for everybody. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maq Posted May 10, 2009 Share Posted May 10, 2009 No doubt about that...8 is definitely an nice improvement to be sure (god' date=' did I just compliment MS? *Aack!*). [/quote'] Relative to M$, yes, that's a compliment, but as a whole, no. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mchl Posted May 10, 2009 Share Posted May 10, 2009 64 kB RAM ought to be enough for everybody. Ouch... you're even more mean than Bill was in his time. At least he gave us 640kB Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.